Comparison Overview

Edenwald Senior Living

VS

The Meadows of Napa Valley

Edenwald Senior Living

800 Southerly Road, Towson, MD, 21286, US
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 750 and 799

Edenwald is a premier retirement community that offers a lifestyle beyond compare. With all the amenities available within our community and the countless activities, resources, and attractions available in Towson and the surrounding area, Edenwald residents engage life fully. Our commitment to our residents’ needs is visible through the wide range of services provided. Residents can run their daily errands without leaving home—pick up milk or eggs at the on-site convenience store, stop in at the on-site Columbia Bank to make a deposit, or invite friends for a fabulous meal at one of Edenwald’s restaurants. Those who choose to live at Edenwald are attracted to the thriving Towson neighborhood and the vast array of cultural, recreational, educational, and civic activities nearby and in the surrounding Baltimore-Washington area.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Meadows of Napa Valley

1800 Atrium Pkwy, None, Napa, California, US, 94559-4837
Last Update: 2025-12-24

The Meadows of Napa Valley is a continuing care retirement community, also known as a life plan community, located in the heart of California’s wine country on 20 beautiful acres. Owned by the Independent Order of Odd Fellows and Rebekahs (IOOF), we offer residents the following levels of care and support: residential living, assisted living, skilled nursing care, memory care, and a full range of services and programs to support overall wellness. The Meadows of Napa Valley is a resident-centered, not-for-profit organization managed by PRS Management, Inc., a subsidiary of Pacific Retirement Services.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edenwald-retirement-community.jpeg
Edenwald Senior Living
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meadows-of-napa-valley-retirement-community.jpeg
The Meadows of Napa Valley
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Edenwald Senior Living
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Meadows of Napa Valley
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edenwald Senior Living in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Meadows of Napa Valley in 2025.

Incident History — Edenwald Senior Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edenwald Senior Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Meadows of Napa Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Meadows of Napa Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edenwald-retirement-community.jpeg
Edenwald Senior Living
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meadows-of-napa-valley-retirement-community.jpeg
The Meadows of Napa Valley
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Edenwald Senior Living company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Meadows of Napa Valley company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Meadows of Napa Valley company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Edenwald Senior Living company.

In the current year, The Meadows of Napa Valley company and Edenwald Senior Living company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Meadows of Napa Valley company nor Edenwald Senior Living company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Meadows of Napa Valley company nor Edenwald Senior Living company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Meadows of Napa Valley company nor Edenwald Senior Living company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living company nor The Meadows of Napa Valley company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living nor The Meadows of Napa Valley holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living company nor The Meadows of Napa Valley company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Edenwald Senior Living company employs more people globally than The Meadows of Napa Valley company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living nor The Meadows of Napa Valley holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living nor The Meadows of Napa Valley holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living nor The Meadows of Napa Valley holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living nor The Meadows of Napa Valley holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living nor The Meadows of Napa Valley holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living nor The Meadows of Napa Valley holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N