Comparison Overview

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Ecopetrol company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Weatherford company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Historically, Weatherford company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ecopetrol company.

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

In the current year, Weatherford company and Ecopetrol company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Neither Weatherford company nor Ecopetrol company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Neither Weatherford company nor Ecopetrol company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Neither Weatherford company nor Ecopetrol company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Neither Ecopetrol company nor Weatherford company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Neither Ecopetrol nor Weatherford holds any compliance certifications.

Q: Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Weatherford company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ecopetrol company.

Ecopetrol

Cra. 13 No. 36-24, Bogotá, ----, CO

Last Update: 2026-01-20

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.ecopetrol.com.co

Ecopetrol (NYSE: EC) es la compañía más grande en Colombia y uno de los principales grupos de energía de Latinoamérica. Cuenta con más de 18.000 empleados y es responsable del 60% de la producción de hidrocarburos en Colombia. Es propietaria de las dos refinerías del Colombia y de la gran parte de la infraestructura del segmento de transporte. A su vez, participa en la venta de energía y distribución de gas. En el panorama internacional, el foco estratégico de Ecopetrol se concentra en las cuencas del continente americano. Tiene operación y participa en proyectos de exploración y producción en Estados Unidos (Cuenca Permian y Golfo de México), Brasil y México. Como parte de la estrategia de sosTECnibilidad, la compañía lidera diferentes iniciativas en aspectos claves como descarbonización, energías renovables, gestión del agua, Desarrollo sostenible del territorio y transformación digital. Ecopetrol (NYSE: EC) is the largest company in Colombia and one of the leading integrated energy groups in the American continent, with operations in over eight countries. Its operations span the hydrocarbons value chain (upstream, midstream, downstream), gas distribution, energy transmission, management of real-time systems, road concessions, and telecommunications. As part of its TESG agenda (Technology, Environmental, Social and Governance), the company is leading several initiatives for diversification and decarbonization through, among others, renewables, electrification, natural climate solutions, and hydrogen. All the above, underpinned by innovation and technology as catalyzers of sustainability.

NAICS: 211

NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction

Employees: 12,558

Subsidiaries: 0

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

View Profile

Weatherford

Dublin, IE

Last Update: 2026-01-18

Between 750 and 799

https://www.weatherford.com

Weatherford International plc (Nasdaq: WFRD) is a leading global energy services company. Operating in approximately 75 countries, the Company answers the challenges of the energy industry with its global talent network of approximately 17,000 team members and approximately 350 operating locations, including manufacturing, research and development, service, and training facilities.

NAICS: 211

NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction

Employees: 29,363

Subsidiaries: 3

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

Ecopetrol

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

Weatherford

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ecopetrol in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weatherford in 2026.

Incident History — Ecopetrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecopetrol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Weatherford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weatherford cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Ecopetrol

Incidents

No Incident

Weatherford

Incidents

No Incident

Ecopetrol company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Weatherford company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Weatherford company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ecopetrol company.

In the current year, Weatherford company and Ecopetrol company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Weatherford company nor Ecopetrol company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Weatherford company nor Ecopetrol company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Weatherford company nor Ecopetrol company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ecopetrol company nor Weatherford company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ecopetrol nor Weatherford holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Weatherford company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ecopetrol company.

Weatherford company employs more people globally than Ecopetrol company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Ecopetrol nor Weatherford holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ecopetrol nor Weatherford holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ecopetrol nor Weatherford holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ecopetrol nor Weatherford holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ecopetrol nor Weatherford holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ecopetrol nor Weatherford holds GDPR certification.

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss4

Base: 7.7

Severity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

References

https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.1

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Comparison Overview

Ecopetrol

VS

Weatherford

Ecopetrol

Weatherford

Compliance Badges Comparison

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

Incident History — Ecopetrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incident History — Weatherford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notable Incidents

No Incident

No Incident

FAQ

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-0933

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21990

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21989

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21988

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21987

Risk Information

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Comparison Overview

Ecopetrol

VS

Weatherford

Ecopetrol

Weatherford

Compliance Badges Comparison

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

Incident History — Ecopetrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incident History — Weatherford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notable Incidents

No Incident

No Incident

FAQ

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Ecopetrol company and Weatherford company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Ecopetrol and Weatherford, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Ecopetrol and Weatherford, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified — Ecopetrol or Weatherford ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant — Ecopetrol or Weatherford ?

Between Ecopetrol and Weatherford, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Ecopetrol and Weatherford, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-0933

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21990

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21989

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21988

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21987

Risk Information