Comparison Overview

Economic Innovation Group

VS

Economic Roundtable

Economic Innovation Group

1307 New York Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20005
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

The Economic Innovation Group (EIG) is an ideas laboratory and advocacy organization dedicated to forging a more dynamic, entrepreneurial, and innovative U.S. economy for the 21st century. Headquartered in Washington, D.C. and led by an experienced, bipartisan team, EIG convenes leading experts from the public and private sectors, develops original policy research, and advances fresh legislative proposals that will bring new jobs, investment, and economic growth to communities across the nation.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Economic Roundtable

244 S San Pedro St, Los Angeles, California, 90012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The Economic Roundtable is a non-profit, public benefit corporation organized to conduct economic, social and environmental research that contributes to the sustainability of individuals and communities. The Economic Roundtable seeks to respect the needs and goals of all neighborhoods and communities of interest affected by its work. Research findings are made readily available to public policy makers, affected communities, and the general public.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/economicinnovationgroup.jpeg
Economic Innovation Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/economic-roundtable.jpeg
Economic Roundtable
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Economic Innovation Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Economic Roundtable
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Economic Innovation Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Economic Roundtable in 2025.

Incident History — Economic Innovation Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Economic Innovation Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Economic Roundtable (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Economic Roundtable cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/economicinnovationgroup.jpeg
Economic Innovation Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/economic-roundtable.jpeg
Economic Roundtable
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Economic Roundtable company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Economic Innovation Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Economic Roundtable company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Economic Innovation Group company.

In the current year, Economic Roundtable company and Economic Innovation Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Economic Roundtable company nor Economic Innovation Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Economic Roundtable company nor Economic Innovation Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Economic Roundtable company nor Economic Innovation Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Economic Innovation Group company nor Economic Roundtable company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Economic Innovation Group nor Economic Roundtable holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Economic Innovation Group company nor Economic Roundtable company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Economic Innovation Group company employs more people globally than Economic Roundtable company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Economic Innovation Group nor Economic Roundtable holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Economic Innovation Group nor Economic Roundtable holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Economic Innovation Group nor Economic Roundtable holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Economic Innovation Group nor Economic Roundtable holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Economic Innovation Group nor Economic Roundtable holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Economic Innovation Group nor Economic Roundtable holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H