Comparison Overview

Economic Roundtable

VS

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)

Economic Roundtable

244 S San Pedro St, Los Angeles, California, 90012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.economicrt.org

The Economic Roundtable is a non-profit, public benefit corporation organized to conduct economic, social and environmental research that contributes to the sustainability of individuals and communities. The Economic Roundtable seeks to respect the needs and goals of all neighborhoods and communities of interest affected by its work. Research findings are made readily available to public policy makers, affected communities, and the general public.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)

223 Liverpool St, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.asbec.asn.au

The Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) is the peak body of key organisations committed to a sustainable built environment in Australia. ASBEC’s membership consists of industry and professional associations, non-government organisations and government observers who are involved in the planning, design, delivery and operation of our built environment, and are concerned with the social and environmental impacts of this sector. ASBEC provides a forum for diverse groups involved in the built environment to gather, find common ground and intelligently discuss contentious issues as well as advocate their own sustainability products, policies and initiatives. ASBEC is a non-profit volunteer organisation. Members commit their time, resources and energy to developing practical opportunities for a more sustainable built environment.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/economic-roundtable.jpeg
Economic Roundtable
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-australian-sustainable-built-environment-council-asbec-.jpeg
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Economic Roundtable
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Economic Roundtable in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) in 2025.

Incident History — Economic Roundtable (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Economic Roundtable cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/economic-roundtable.jpeg
Economic Roundtable
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-australian-sustainable-built-environment-council-asbec-.jpeg
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Economic Roundtable company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Economic Roundtable company.

In the current year, Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company and Economic Roundtable company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company nor Economic Roundtable company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company nor Economic Roundtable company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company nor Economic Roundtable company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Economic Roundtable company nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Economic Roundtable nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Economic Roundtable company nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Economic Roundtable company and Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Economic Roundtable nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Economic Roundtable nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Economic Roundtable nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Economic Roundtable nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Economic Roundtable nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Economic Roundtable nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References