Comparison Overview

EconoFact

VS

Amberjack Publishing

EconoFact

160 Packard Avenue, Medford, 02155, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://econofact.org/

EconoFact is a non-partisan publication designed to bring key facts and incisive analysis to the national debate on economic and social policies. It is written by leading academic economists from across the country who belong to the EconoFact Network, and published by the Edward R. Murrow Center for a Digital World at The Fletcher School at Tufts University.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Amberjack Publishing

1472 E Iron Eagle Dr, Eagle, 83616, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://amberjackpublishing.com/

Amberjack Publishing is a publishing company based in Idaho with a strong vision and passion for books. We have officially been telling stories since 2014, but we were born storytellers. We are committed to sharing the literature of the individual that dares to stand alone, one who isn't afraid to challenge the status quo, to be different—to be more, not less. We want to help writers tell these stories and to help readers discover them. Amberjack Publishing’s promise is the joy of discovery and the celebration of flawed characters who help readers connect to humanity. Our authors believe in a world which can be more thoughtful, more humane, and more beautiful. We respect the faith that each reader commits to trusting us to share individual stories that are vital, empathetic, and transformational.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/econofact.jpeg
EconoFact
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amberjack-publishing.jpeg
Amberjack Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EconoFact
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amberjack Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EconoFact in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amberjack Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — EconoFact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EconoFact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amberjack Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amberjack Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/econofact.jpeg
EconoFact
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amberjack-publishing.jpeg
Amberjack Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both EconoFact company and Amberjack Publishing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Amberjack Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EconoFact company.

In the current year, Amberjack Publishing company and EconoFact company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amberjack Publishing company nor EconoFact company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amberjack Publishing company nor EconoFact company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amberjack Publishing company nor EconoFact company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EconoFact company nor Amberjack Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EconoFact nor Amberjack Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EconoFact company nor Amberjack Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EconoFact company employs more people globally than Amberjack Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither EconoFact nor Amberjack Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EconoFact nor Amberjack Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EconoFact nor Amberjack Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EconoFact nor Amberjack Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EconoFact nor Amberjack Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EconoFact nor Amberjack Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References