Comparison Overview

Ecodorp Brabant

VS

Cenfri

Ecodorp Brabant

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Ecodorp Brabant is een vereniging van ongeveer 100 leden die op een geheel duurzame manier ergens in Brabant willen gaan wonen. Wij gaan een Ecodorp bouwen, met ecologische huizen en voorzieningen, een plek waar we alle facetten van het leven op een duurzame manier kunnen regelen. Duurzaam houdt ook in: kleinschalig en lokaal. De omgeving waar wij ons zullen gaan vestigen zal daarom een belangrijke rol voor het Ecodorp gaan spelen en vice versa. Voor de gemeente waartoe wij zullen gaan behoren, zal het Ecodorp met haar ecotoerisme, haar nieuwe ondernemingen, de samenwerking met bestaande ondernemingen en de positieve publiciteit een aanwinst zijn. Want we zijn ook een gigantische denktank van creatieve, actieve, positieve, op duurzaamheid gerichte mensen.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cenfri

Farm 1, Block A, The Vineyards Office Estate, Cape Town, 7530, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2008, Cenfri is an independent, not-for-profit development consultancy. We have physical offices in Cape Town and Kigali and have worked in more than 40 countries across Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America. ​​Find out more: https://cenfri.org/ ​ In collaboration with our partners, we undertake research and offer capacity building, convening and innovation support to businesses, governments, regulators and donors in Africa and beyond.​

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ecodorp Brabant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cenfri.jpeg
Cenfri
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ecodorp Brabant
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cenfri
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ecodorp Brabant in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cenfri in 2025.

Incident History — Ecodorp Brabant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecodorp Brabant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cenfri (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cenfri cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ecodorp Brabant
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cenfri.jpeg
Cenfri
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ecodorp Brabant company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cenfri company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cenfri company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ecodorp Brabant company.

In the current year, Cenfri company and Ecodorp Brabant company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cenfri company nor Ecodorp Brabant company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cenfri company nor Ecodorp Brabant company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cenfri company nor Ecodorp Brabant company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant company nor Cenfri company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant nor Cenfri holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant company nor Cenfri company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cenfri company employs more people globally than Ecodorp Brabant company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant nor Cenfri holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant nor Cenfri holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant nor Cenfri holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant nor Cenfri holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant nor Cenfri holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ecodorp Brabant nor Cenfri holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X