Comparison Overview

Eclipse Gaming Systems

VS

Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel

Eclipse Gaming Systems

2236 Northmont Pkwy, Duluth, Georgia, 30096, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

With a core focus on the Native American gaming market, Eclipse Gaming Systems develops best-in-class products that drive deeper player engagement and powerful results that Go Beyond the Game. Eclipse Gaming, headquartered in Atlanta, GA, is composed of a diverse mix of innovative and passionate trailblazers with extensive experience in the casino gaming, technology, and entertainment sectors. We are a fast growing, agile company with an experienced leadership team and a commitment to making an impact. Our people are imaginative creators who aren’t afraid to push the boundaries to develop engaging gaming experiences for the player and deliver exceptional value for our partners.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel

777 Bannock Trail, Fort Hall, 83203, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Casino | Hotel | Restaurant | Bingo | RV Park | Spa | Event Center | Entertainment Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel is home to an 85 thousand square foot gaming operation, 156 hotel rooms, the largest ballroom in the region at 15 thousand square feet, full-service Cedar Spa, six food and beverage outlets and High Stakes Bingo Hall. The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes owns and operates three gaming properties including the Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel, Sage Hill Casino and Travel Center and Bannock Peak Casino and Truck Stop. The Economic Growth Plan continues to evolve for the health and benefit of the Tribal membership and the Eastern Idaho Region.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 115
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eclipsegaming.jpeg
Eclipse Gaming Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shoshone-bannock-casino-hotel.jpeg
Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eclipse Gaming Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eclipse Gaming Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel in 2025.

Incident History — Eclipse Gaming Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eclipse Gaming Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eclipsegaming.jpeg
Eclipse Gaming Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shoshone-bannock-casino-hotel.jpeg
Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eclipse Gaming Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Eclipse Gaming Systems company.

In the current year, Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company and Eclipse Gaming Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company nor Eclipse Gaming Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company nor Eclipse Gaming Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company nor Eclipse Gaming Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems company nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems company nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel company employs more people globally than Eclipse Gaming Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eclipse Gaming Systems nor Shoshone-Bannock Casino Hotel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H