Comparison Overview

eClinicalWorks

VS

Symantec

eClinicalWorks

2 Technology Drive, Westborough, MA, 01581, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

eClinicalWorks is a privately held leader in healthcare IT, providing comprehensive Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Practice Management (PM) solutions used by more than 850,000 medical professionals in more than 20 countries. We develop innovative, customizable tools for documentation, Population Health, Patient Engagement, and Revenue Cycle Management. Through leading-edge technology and putting the needs of clients first, we help medical professionals improve the quality of care, reduce costs, and meet regulatory requirements.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 5,049
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Symantec

1320 Ridder Park Dr, San Jose, California, 95131, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Your backstage pass to the most epic cybersecurity solutions on the market for Endpoint, Network, Data and Cloud security. Featuring worldwide (yet local-to-you) partner experts with the chops to deliver enterprise-grade security, whether you're a solo act or a supergroup. Be first in line to experience defense that goes to 11. Hit us up: https://engage.broadcom.com/ESG-contact-us

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 13,228
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eclinicalworks.jpeg
eClinicalWorks
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/symantec.jpeg
Symantec
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
eClinicalWorks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Symantec
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eClinicalWorks in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Symantec in 2025.

Incident History โ€” eClinicalWorks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eClinicalWorks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Symantec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Symantec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eclinicalworks.jpeg
eClinicalWorks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/symantec.jpeg
Symantec
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both eClinicalWorks company and Symantec company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Symantec company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas eClinicalWorks company has not reported any.

In the current year, Symantec company has reported more cyber incidents than eClinicalWorks company.

Symantec company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while eClinicalWorks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Symantec company has disclosed at least one data breach, while eClinicalWorks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Symantec company nor eClinicalWorks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Symantec company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while eClinicalWorks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Symantec company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to eClinicalWorks company.

Symantec company employs more people globally than eClinicalWorks company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X