Comparison Overview

eClinicalWorks

VS

Grab

eClinicalWorks

2 Technology Drive, Westborough, MA, 01581, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.eclinicalworks.com

Strong

eClinicalWorks is a privately held leader in healthcare IT, providing comprehensive Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Practice Management (PM) solutions used by more than 850,000 medical professionals in more than 20 countries. We develop innovative, customizable tools for documentation, Population Health, Patient Engagement, and Revenue Cycle Management. Through leading-edge technology and putting the needs of clients first, we help medical professionals improve the quality of care, reduce costs, and meet regulatory requirements.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 5,049
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grab

3 Media Close, Singapore, Singapore, 138498, SG
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
https://grab.careers

Grab is Southeast Asia’s leading superapp, offering a suite of services consisting of deliveries, mobility, financial services, enterprise and others. Grabbers come from all over the world, and we are united by a common mission: to drive Southeast Asia forward by creating economic empowerment for everyone. At Grab, every Grabber is guided by The Grab Way, which explains our mission and the operating principles on how we can achieve it together. We call these principles the 4Hs: Heart We work together as OneGrab to serve communities in Southeast Asia Hunger We work to understand ground truths and drive improvements, big and small Honour We keep our word and steward our resources wisely to build and sustain trust Humility We are a constant work-in-progress, and we never stop learning to get better

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 49,204
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eclinicalworks.jpeg
eClinicalWorks
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grabapp.jpeg
Grab
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
eClinicalWorks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eClinicalWorks in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grab in 2025.

Incident History — eClinicalWorks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eClinicalWorks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eclinicalworks.jpeg
eClinicalWorks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grabapp.jpeg
Grab
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both eClinicalWorks company and Grab company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Grab company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to eClinicalWorks company.

In the current year, Grab company and eClinicalWorks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grab company nor eClinicalWorks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grab company nor eClinicalWorks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grab company nor eClinicalWorks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither eClinicalWorks company nor Grab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Grab company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to eClinicalWorks company.

Grab company employs more people globally than eClinicalWorks company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References