Comparison Overview

eClerx

VS

Algar Tech

eClerx

29 Bank Street, Fort, 1st Floor, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 023
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

eClerx is a productized services company, bringing together people, technology and domain expertise to amplify business results. Our mission is to set the benchmark for client service and success in our industry. Our vision is to be the innovation partner of choice for technology, data analytics and process management services.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 18,712
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Algar Tech

Avenida Floriano Peixoto, 6.500, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, BR, 38405-184
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Somos a Algar Tech CX. Com 26 anos de mercado, atuamos como parceira de negócio para a transformação digital de grandes corporações. Nosso portfólio possui serviços de Relacionamento com o Cliente, que visam melhorar a experiência dos consumidores. Somos mais de 7 mil associados que trabalham com o propósito de conectar pessoas e organizações de um jeito único, aliados a um amplo ecossistema de parceiros. Somos referência no setor, com especialização em indústrias, práticas e com competências para a digitalização. Somos a empresa BPO do Ano na categoria de Médias Operações Multicanal pelo Prêmio Consumidor Moderno 2024 e recebemos o troféu Ouro em Customer Experience pelo Smart Customer. Para trabalhar conosco, acesse o nosso banco de talentos: www.bancodetalentosalgar.com.br Para nos conhecer mais, acesse o nosso site: www.algartech.com/cx

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,340
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eclerx.jpeg
eClerx
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/algar-tech.jpeg
Algar Tech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
eClerx
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Algar Tech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eClerx in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Algar Tech in 2025.

Incident History — eClerx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eClerx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Algar Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Algar Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eclerx.jpeg
eClerx
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/algar-tech.jpeg
Algar Tech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Algar Tech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to eClerx company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Algar Tech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to eClerx company.

In the current year, Algar Tech company and eClerx company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Algar Tech company nor eClerx company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Algar Tech company nor eClerx company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Algar Tech company nor eClerx company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither eClerx company nor Algar Tech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither eClerx nor Algar Tech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Algar Tech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to eClerx company.

eClerx company employs more people globally than Algar Tech company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither eClerx nor Algar Tech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither eClerx nor Algar Tech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither eClerx nor Algar Tech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither eClerx nor Algar Tech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither eClerx nor Algar Tech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither eClerx nor Algar Tech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H