Comparison Overview

ECHO Colorado

VS

Center for Financial Training

ECHO Colorado

13055 E 17th Ave, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

ECHO Colorado (Extension for Community Health Outcomes) offers free, interactive, video-based learning programs for health professionals and those whose work impacts community health. ECHO sessions combine the learning and case-based sharing aspects of an in-person training with the improved access and convenience of connecting virtually. ECHO series typically consist of four to six sessions held one hour per week around health-related topics, bringing health experts together with peers to share knowledge and experience using technology, not proximity, to connect. ECHO participants expand their skill set and ability to provide better care and services to their local communities—without incurring the expense and hassle of travel.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Financial Training

10 Waterside Dr, Farmington, Connecticut, 06032, US
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 750 and 799

The Center for Financial Training Atlantic and Central States is a premier provider of education and training for the financial services industry. With a rich history, CFT has been dedicated to serving the educational needs of financial professionals for over a century. CFT offers a wide range of professionally administered education and training programs that continually meet the evolving needs of the financial services industry. Each year, financial institution employees enroll in CFT’s enriching programs. Whether you’re looking to advance your career or stay up-to-date with the latest industry trends, CFT has the resources and expertise to help you succeed. Join the thousands of banking professionals who have benefited from CFT’s educational programs and take your career to the next level today!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echo-colorado.jpeg
ECHO Colorado
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-financial-training-atlantic-&-central-states.jpeg
Center for Financial Training
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ECHO Colorado
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Financial Training
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ECHO Colorado in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Financial Training in 2025.

Incident History — ECHO Colorado (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ECHO Colorado cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Financial Training (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Financial Training cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echo-colorado.jpeg
ECHO Colorado
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-financial-training-atlantic-&-central-states.jpeg
Center for Financial Training
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ECHO Colorado company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Financial Training company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Financial Training company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ECHO Colorado company.

In the current year, Center for Financial Training company and ECHO Colorado company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Financial Training company nor ECHO Colorado company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Financial Training company nor ECHO Colorado company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Financial Training company nor ECHO Colorado company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ECHO Colorado company nor Center for Financial Training company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ECHO Colorado nor Center for Financial Training holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ECHO Colorado company nor Center for Financial Training company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Financial Training company employs more people globally than ECHO Colorado company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither ECHO Colorado nor Center for Financial Training holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ECHO Colorado nor Center for Financial Training holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ECHO Colorado nor Center for Financial Training holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ECHO Colorado nor Center for Financial Training holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ECHO Colorado nor Center for Financial Training holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ECHO Colorado nor Center for Financial Training holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X