Comparison Overview

EBWA

VS

ERIKS FRANCE

EBWA

1556 Deloss St., Indianapolis, IN, US, 46201
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

EBWA is one of the oldest and most experienced electron beam welding operations in the US. Electron beam welding is a superior quality weld, and as a result it has applications in aviation, aerospace, defense, technology and other major manufacturing industries. EBWA, doing business since 1968, holds special certifications (NADCAP, AS and ISO) that are critical to the clients they serves. Please see www.ebwelding.com for more information.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ERIKS FRANCE

28, rue Wilson, Décines-Charpieu, undefined, 69150, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

ERIKS est un fournisseur de services industriels spécialisés. Nous aidons nos clients à gérer et à développer de meilleures lignes de production, de meilleurs composants, de meilleures machines et de meilleurs projets, tout en réduisant les coûts. ERIKS propose plus de 900 000 produits techniques de marques A et de marques propres, dans les domaines de la robinetterie, des joints, des tuyaux, des plastiques, de la transmission de puissance, de l'étanchéité et des polymères, ainsi que des outils, de la maintenance et de la sécurité. Notre savoir-faire en matière de produits et d'applications, notre expertise en ingénierie et notre large gamme de services techniques permettent à l'industrie de mieux fonctionner. Nos services de chaîne d'approvisionnement permettent de fournir ces solutions à nos clients, au bon moment et au bon endroit. Depuis plus de 80 ans, nos 5 000 collègues qualifiés répartis dans 12 pays d'Europe occidentale et d'Asie travaillent dur chaque jour pour donner vie à ces solutions. Et nous continuerons à soutenir l'industrie de demain en nous concentrant sur la durabilité, l'innovation et la numérisation. Let’s make industry work better

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 138
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebwa.jpeg
EBWA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eriks-france.jpeg
ERIKS FRANCE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EBWA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ERIKS FRANCE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EBWA in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ERIKS FRANCE in 2025.

Incident History — EBWA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EBWA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ERIKS FRANCE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ERIKS FRANCE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebwa.jpeg
EBWA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eriks-france.jpeg
ERIKS FRANCE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EBWA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ERIKS FRANCE company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ERIKS FRANCE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EBWA company.

In the current year, ERIKS FRANCE company and EBWA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ERIKS FRANCE company nor EBWA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ERIKS FRANCE company nor EBWA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ERIKS FRANCE company nor EBWA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EBWA company nor ERIKS FRANCE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EBWA nor ERIKS FRANCE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ERIKS FRANCE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EBWA company.

ERIKS FRANCE company employs more people globally than EBWA company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither EBWA nor ERIKS FRANCE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EBWA nor ERIKS FRANCE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EBWA nor ERIKS FRANCE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EBWA nor ERIKS FRANCE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EBWA nor ERIKS FRANCE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EBWA nor ERIKS FRANCE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H