Comparison Overview

Ebox Media Ltd

VS

Panther Prnting

Ebox Media Ltd

Maytham Farm, Maytham Road, Rolvenden, Kent, TN17 4QA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Ebox Media Ltd was established in 2007 and specialises in Sign, Design & Print Solutions throughout the UK. Ebox Media is a London based creative thinking company that intuitively produces signage solutions for a range of clients including startup businesses to market leading companies. The success of our business is reflected in our enthusiasm for signs. We believe that signage is an extension of your brand and therefore needs to be delivered with the same visual presence as any professionally designed media to fully optimise its success. Our approach is to provide our customers with a turnkey service from initial consultation to design, manufacture and then installation. Our team of creative in-house designers will work with your concept and deliver your project with innovation and flair. We provide the following services * Signage * Print Media * Web Design * Brand Development * Graphic Design www.eboxmedia.co.uk We also operate " Self Design" e-commerce websites to allow customers the opportunity to be creative and design their own signs. www.designasign.co.uk www.designahousesign.co.uk

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Panther Prnting

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11

" by American Prinreceived numerous Benny Awards for Excellence in Print Quality and Production. Providing a full array of Creative Design capabilities, 1-and-2 color QuickPrint and 5-Color and 6-Color 28" and 40" Presses, and complete state-of-the-art Finishing and Mailing Equipment, PANTHER PRINTING is uniquely qualified to handle all of your Design, Printing, Publishing, and Mailing needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebox-media-ltd.jpeg
Ebox Media Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Panther Prnting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ebox Media Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Panther Prnting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ebox Media Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panther Prnting in 2025.

Incident History — Ebox Media Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ebox Media Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Panther Prnting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panther Prnting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebox-media-ltd.jpeg
Ebox Media Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Panther Prnting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Panther Prnting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ebox Media Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Panther Prnting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ebox Media Ltd company.

In the current year, Panther Prnting company and Ebox Media Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Panther Prnting company nor Ebox Media Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Panther Prnting company nor Ebox Media Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Panther Prnting company nor Ebox Media Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd company nor Panther Prnting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd nor Panther Prnting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd company nor Panther Prnting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Panther Prnting company employs more people globally than Ebox Media Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd nor Panther Prnting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd nor Panther Prnting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd nor Panther Prnting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd nor Panther Prnting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd nor Panther Prnting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ebox Media Ltd nor Panther Prnting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N