Comparison Overview

Eberspächer Group

VS

FORVIA

Eberspächer Group

Eberspächerstrasse 24, Esslingen, Baden-Württemberg, 73730, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-03

The Eberspächer Group is one of the world's leading system developers and suppliers to the automotive industry. With its three Divisions - Exhaust Technology, Climate Control Systems, and Automotive Controls - the Company is a valued innovation partner and pacesetter for automotive manufacturers worldwide. Eberspächer stands for innovative solutions. All European, North American and increasingly Asian vehicle manufacturers utilize our groundbreaking technologies. We innovate rapidly to realize the mobility of tomorrow today. By offering innovative solutions we are one step ahead to cope with the ever more stringent emission standards, the complex thermal management of electrical drive types as well as the constantly growing demands placed on vehicle electronics. Link to Eberspächer Social Media Privacy Policy Notice and Our Netiquette for Social Networks: https://www.eberspaecher-climate.com/privacy-policy-facebook Imprint: https://www.eberspaecher-career.com/imprint.html

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 4,934
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

FORVIA

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

FORVIA comprises the complementary technology and industrial strengths of Faurecia and HELLA. With over 300 industrial sites and 77 R&D centers, 150,000 people, including more than 35,000 engineers across 40+ countries, FORVIA provides a unique and comprehensive approach to the automotive challenges of today and tomorrow. Composed of 6 business groups with 24 product lines, and a strong IP portfolio of over 15,000 patents, FORVIA is focused on becoming the preferred innovation and integration partner for OEMS worldwide. FORVIA aims to be a change maker committed to foreseeing and making the mobility transformation happen.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 56,528
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eberspaecher.jpeg
Eberspächer Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forvia.jpeg
FORVIA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eberspächer Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FORVIA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eberspächer Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA in 2025.

Incident History — Eberspächer Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eberspächer Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FORVIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eberspaecher.jpeg
Eberspächer Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Server Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forvia.jpeg
FORVIA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eberspächer Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FORVIA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Eberspächer Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FORVIA company has not reported any.

In the current year, FORVIA company and Eberspächer Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FORVIA company nor Eberspächer Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FORVIA company nor Eberspächer Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Eberspächer Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while FORVIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Eberspächer Group company nor FORVIA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eberspächer Group nor FORVIA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FORVIA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eberspächer Group company.

FORVIA company employs more people globally than Eberspächer Group company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Eberspächer Group nor FORVIA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eberspächer Group nor FORVIA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eberspächer Group nor FORVIA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eberspächer Group nor FORVIA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eberspächer Group nor FORVIA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eberspächer Group nor FORVIA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X