Comparison Overview

Eberl & Kœsel

VS

First in Print

Eberl & Kœsel

Am Buchweg 1, Altusried, Bayern, DE, 87452
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://eberlkoesel.de

Unsere Vision: Wir werden der führende und verlässliche Partner anspruchsvoller Unternehmen, Verlage und Designer bei der Produktion hochqualitativer Druckerzeugnisse. Technologisch präzise und handwerklich perfekt, vom Einzelstück bis zur anspruchsvollen Großauflage. Kreativ und innovativ. Inspirierend und individuell in jeder Beziehung. Unsere Mission: Für Sie entwickeln wir außergewöhnliche und nachhaltige Lösungen. Mit neuester Drucktechnologie, individuell verarbeitet und veredelt. Mit digitalen Plattformen für flexible und maßgeschneiderte Prozesse in der Produktion und in der Logistik. Mit dem Fachwissen und der Zuverlässigkeit unserer eingespielten Teams. So entstehen Produkte, die Maßstäbe setzen. Für Kunden mit höchsten Ansprüchen.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

First in Print

8515 Baymeadows Way, #102, Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://firstinprint.com

Artsy at heart and technical up stairs, our team’s extensive experience with graphic design and print production makes us best friends with marketers and designers. With a special focus on food and beverage brands, we offer point-of-purchase and print products to make marketing dreams come true. Our website is designed to make ordering these products very easy for our clients. Shop online! http://firstinprint.com/ Each year, we produce literally millions of bottle neckers for top brands and importers across the country! From bottle neckers and shelf talkers to case cards and tasting booths – we offer a growing product line dedicated to helping food and beverage brands flourish.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eberlkoesel.jpeg
Eberl & Kœsel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/first-in-print.jpeg
First in Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eberl & Kœsel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
First in Print
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eberl & Kœsel in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First in Print in 2025.

Incident History — Eberl & Kœsel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eberl & Kœsel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — First in Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First in Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eberlkoesel.jpeg
Eberl & Kœsel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/first-in-print.jpeg
First in Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Eberl & Kœsel company and First in Print company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, First in Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Eberl & Kœsel company.

In the current year, First in Print company and Eberl & Kœsel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither First in Print company nor Eberl & Kœsel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither First in Print company nor Eberl & Kœsel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither First in Print company nor Eberl & Kœsel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel company nor First in Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel nor First in Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel company nor First in Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

First in Print company employs more people globally than Eberl & Kœsel company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel nor First in Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel nor First in Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel nor First in Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel nor First in Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel nor First in Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eberl & Kœsel nor First in Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References