Comparison Overview

Eberle Communications Group

VS

Muslim Hands

Eberle Communications Group

1420 Spring Hill Rd., McLean, 20015, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eberleassociates.com

Because we want to create a better society for our children and for their children, we are devoted to raising funds for organizations that promote the values we believe in. The groups we serve — advocacy groups, foundations, public interest law firms — share our desire to make America a better place in which to live. Their goal, like ours, is to pass along values and traditions that build character and strengthen the society in which we live, work, worship, and play.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Muslim Hands

148 Gregory Boulevard, Nottingham, England, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.muslimhands.org.uk

In 1993, a community in Nottingham, moved by the devastation of the Bosnian war, sprang into action. A small group of volunteers began collecting money, clothes and medicine for the people of Bosnia. Muslim Hands, an international aid agency and NGO, grew from this grass roots movement and since these first efforts, we have responded to countless more emergencies, as well as establishing long term projects such as schools, healthcare clinics and livelihood programmes worldwide. We are working in over 50 countries and have field offices in over 30 of these. By working closely with our partners and offices on the ground, we are able to distribute aid in an effective, efficient, transparent and wholly accountable manner and to make a lasting difference to the communities we work with. Dedicated to tackling the root causes of poverty around the world, Muslim Hands is passionate about working beyond the provision of immediate relief, towards supporting communities over the long-term.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 664
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eberle-communications-group.jpeg
Eberle Communications Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muslimhands.jpeg
Muslim Hands
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eberle Communications Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Muslim Hands
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eberle Communications Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Muslim Hands in 2025.

Incident History — Eberle Communications Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eberle Communications Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Muslim Hands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Muslim Hands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eberle-communications-group.jpeg
Eberle Communications Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muslimhands.jpeg
Muslim Hands
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Muslim Hands company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eberle Communications Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Muslim Hands company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Eberle Communications Group company.

In the current year, Muslim Hands company and Eberle Communications Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Muslim Hands company nor Eberle Communications Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Muslim Hands company nor Eberle Communications Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Muslim Hands company nor Eberle Communications Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Eberle Communications Group company nor Muslim Hands company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eberle Communications Group nor Muslim Hands holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Eberle Communications Group company nor Muslim Hands company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Muslim Hands company employs more people globally than Eberle Communications Group company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Eberle Communications Group nor Muslim Hands holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eberle Communications Group nor Muslim Hands holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eberle Communications Group nor Muslim Hands holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eberle Communications Group nor Muslim Hands holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eberle Communications Group nor Muslim Hands holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eberle Communications Group nor Muslim Hands holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References