Comparison Overview

Eberhardt

VS

Printi

Eberhardt

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eberhardtsigns.com/

Eberhardt Signs, one of the UK's leading sign companies, has a history spanning over 100 years. At the turn of the century Mr Eberhardt's grandfather was in London making individual light bulbs and Geissler tubes which were the forerunner to neon lighting. In 1897, for an exhibition commemorating Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee he assisted with a display of Geissler tubes.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Printi

R. João Ferreira de Camargo, 714, Barueri, SP, 06460-060, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://sua.printi.com.br/corporativo

Printi is disrupting the inefficient Brazilian printing market. Utilizing sophisticated technology and the scale of the internet, Printi offers lowest prices, high quality, and a broad product portfolio to corporations of all sizes. Best-in-class customer service is coupled with unrivaled turnaround times to take the experience of producing commercial and marketing materials to a new level.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 485
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Eberhardt
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printi.jpeg
Printi
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eberhardt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Printi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eberhardt in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printi in 2025.

Incident History — Eberhardt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eberhardt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Printi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Eberhardt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printi.jpeg
Printi
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eberhardt company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Printi company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Eberhardt company.

In the current year, Printi company and Eberhardt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Printi company nor Eberhardt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Printi company nor Eberhardt company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Printi company nor Eberhardt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Eberhardt company nor Printi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eberhardt nor Printi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Printi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eberhardt company.

Printi company employs more people globally than Eberhardt company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Eberhardt nor Printi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eberhardt nor Printi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eberhardt nor Printi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eberhardt nor Printi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eberhardt nor Printi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eberhardt nor Printi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References