Comparison Overview

Ebanista

VS

Sidlar

Ebanista

2015 Newport Boulevard, Costa Mesa, CA, US, 92627
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Ebanista was founded in 2002 by husband and wife design team, Fari and Melinda Pakzad - whose cultivated passion for exquisite furnishings was born from thirty-six years of designing and building the most sought-after custom homes in the country. Wanting to create a superlative collection of extraordinary furnishings and objets d'art that could be shared with the whole world - and not just their private clientele - the team opened Ebanista showrooms in major design centers from coast to coast. Ebanista has become a resource to the world's most distinguished interior designers and architects and continues to introduce designs that intrigue, inspire, and delight.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 205
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sidlar

Avenida Otto Baumgart, Sao Paulo, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Há décadas a Sidlar abre as portas do cobiçado mercado de Home Decor para milhares de profissionais que buscam uma nova carreira e novos desafios! Com soluções mobiliárias completas (de móveis de decoração à marcenaria), integrando todas as etapas da comercialização (do esboço inicial do projeto à instalação final), o modelo de “one-stop shop” permite ao profissional ter contato com todo o universo do design de interiores, descobrir a sua vocação e planejar os próximos passos da carreira - dentro ou fora da Sidlar. A presença estratégica em shopping centers, com grande fluxo de clientes, promove um acelerado acúmulo de experiência comercial, ganho financeiro e a possibilidade de identificar oportunidades de desenvolvimento e crescimento neste mercado.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 136
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebanista-inc..jpeg
Ebanista
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-sidlar.jpeg
Sidlar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ebanista
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sidlar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ebanista in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sidlar in 2025.

Incident History — Ebanista (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ebanista cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sidlar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sidlar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebanista-inc..jpeg
Ebanista
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-sidlar.jpeg
Sidlar
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ebanista company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sidlar company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sidlar company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ebanista company.

In the current year, Sidlar company and Ebanista company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sidlar company nor Ebanista company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sidlar company nor Ebanista company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sidlar company nor Ebanista company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ebanista company nor Sidlar company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ebanista nor Sidlar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ebanista company nor Sidlar company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ebanista company employs more people globally than Sidlar company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Ebanista nor Sidlar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ebanista nor Sidlar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ebanista nor Sidlar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ebanista nor Sidlar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ebanista nor Sidlar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ebanista nor Sidlar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.