Comparison Overview

EatStreet

VS

Zomato

EatStreet

44 E Mifflin St, Suite 400 , Madison, Wisconsin, US, 53703
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Invented in 2010 by three undergrad juniors in between midterms and term papers, EatStreet was built to be the smartest shortcut to the food you crave. Based in Madison, WI, EatStreet is the largest independent food ordering service in the United States offering food delivery and takeout from over 15,000 restaurants in over 250 cities. Hungry for more details? Visit eatstreet.com!

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 186
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Zomato

Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

Zomato’s mission statement is “better food for more people.” Since our inception in 2010, we have grown tremendously, both in scope and scale - and emerged as India’s most trusted brand during the pandemic, along with being one of the largest hyperlocal delivery networks in the country. Today, Zomato represents a wide range of cultures through its diversified 5000+ team members, 3.5 lakh+ delivery partners, and our biggest collective of the finest restaurant partners. We are grateful that our business is able to provide upward social and economic movement for millions of households – of our delivery partners, as well as restaurant staff. We think of all of us as one big family! Our passion is driven by purpose and we take immense pride in our initiative ‘Feeding India’, one of India’s largest not-for-profits working to ensure that nobody in India goes to bed hungry. As of now, Feeding India provides over 150,000 nutritious meals to the underprivileged every day. In April 2020, Feeding India ran one of the largest food distribution drives in the world during the first wave of COVID, and distributed 78 million meals to daily wagers across the length and breadth of the country. During the second wave of COVID-19, Feeding India was again the first to act. We were able to source over 9,000 oxygen concentrators and distributed them for free to government hospitals across the country. This helped save millions of lives during one of the worst humanitarian crises faced by India in the recent times. We’re innovating hard to make last-mile delivery carbon neutral, to eliminate the use of plastic packaging, create meaningful opportunities in the gig economy, and to feed our country’s ever-growing appetite for high-quality, affordable, and hygienic food, one delivery at a time!

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14,195
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eatstreet.jpeg
EatStreet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zomato.jpeg
Zomato
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EatStreet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zomato
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EatStreet in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zomato in 2025.

Incident History — EatStreet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EatStreet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zomato (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zomato cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eatstreet.jpeg
EatStreet
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Motivation: Unspecified
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zomato.jpeg
Zomato
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2017
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zomato company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EatStreet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EatStreet company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Zomato company.

In the current year, Zomato company and EatStreet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zomato company nor EatStreet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

EatStreet company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Zomato company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Zomato company nor EatStreet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EatStreet company nor Zomato company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EatStreet nor Zomato holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EatStreet company nor Zomato company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Zomato company employs more people globally than EatStreet company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither EatStreet nor Zomato holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Zomato holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Zomato holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Zomato holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Zomato holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Zomato holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X