Comparison Overview

EatStreet

VS

The Death Star

EatStreet

44 E Mifflin St, Suite 400 , Madison, Wisconsin, US, 53703
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Invented in 2010 by three undergrad juniors in between midterms and term papers, EatStreet was built to be the smartest shortcut to the food you crave. Based in Madison, WI, EatStreet is the largest independent food ordering service in the United States offering food delivery and takeout from over 15,000 restaurants in over 250 cities. Hungry for more details? Visit eatstreet.com!

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 186
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

The Death Star

Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Death Star is to keep the local systems "in line". As we have recently dissolved our Board of Directors, there is little resistance to our larger goal of universal domination. Our Stormtroopers are excellent shots and operate with our Navy, and are fielded like marines - separate from our army.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eatstreet.jpeg
EatStreet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-death-star.jpeg
The Death Star
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EatStreet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Death Star
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EatStreet in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Death Star in 2025.

Incident History — EatStreet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EatStreet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Death Star (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Death Star cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eatstreet.jpeg
EatStreet
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Motivation: Unspecified
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-death-star.jpeg
The Death Star
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Death Star company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EatStreet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EatStreet company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Death Star company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Death Star company and EatStreet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Death Star company nor EatStreet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

EatStreet company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The Death Star company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Death Star company nor EatStreet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EatStreet company nor The Death Star company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EatStreet nor The Death Star holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EatStreet company nor The Death Star company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Death Star company employs more people globally than EatStreet company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither EatStreet nor The Death Star holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor The Death Star holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor The Death Star holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor The Death Star holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EatStreet nor The Death Star holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EatStreet nor The Death Star holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X