Comparison Overview

EatStreet

VS

Arrow Electronics

EatStreet

44 E Mifflin St, Suite 400 , Madison, Wisconsin, US, 53703
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Invented in 2010 by three undergrad juniors in between midterms and term papers, EatStreet was built to be the smartest shortcut to the food you crave. Based in Madison, WI, EatStreet is the largest independent food ordering service in the United States offering food delivery and takeout from over 15,000 restaurants in over 250 cities. Hungry for more details? Visit eatstreet.com!

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 186
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Arrow Electronics

9201 East Dry Creek Road, Centennial, Colorado, US, 80112
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) guides innovation forward for thousands of leading technology manufacturers and service providers. With 2024 sales of $27.9 billion, Arrow develops technology solutions that help improve business and daily life. Our broad portfolio that spans the entire technology landscape, helps customers design, distribute and deploy forward-thinking products that make the benefits of technology accessible to as many people as possible. Learn more at arrow.com. Are you thinking Five Years Out? Join us at careers.arrow.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19,812
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eatstreet.jpeg
EatStreet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrow-electronics.jpeg
Arrow Electronics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EatStreet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arrow Electronics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EatStreet in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arrow Electronics in 2025.

Incident History — EatStreet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EatStreet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arrow Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arrow Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eatstreet.jpeg
EatStreet
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Motivation: Unspecified
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrow-electronics.jpeg
Arrow Electronics
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2010
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Arrow Electronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EatStreet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EatStreet company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Arrow Electronics company.

In the current year, Arrow Electronics company and EatStreet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arrow Electronics company nor EatStreet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Arrow Electronics company and EatStreet company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Arrow Electronics company nor EatStreet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EatStreet company nor Arrow Electronics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EatStreet nor Arrow Electronics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Arrow Electronics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EatStreet company.

Arrow Electronics company employs more people globally than EatStreet company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither EatStreet nor Arrow Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Arrow Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Arrow Electronics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Arrow Electronics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Arrow Electronics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EatStreet nor Arrow Electronics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X