Comparison Overview

kwiff

VS

Majestic Star Casino

kwiff

undefined, London, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

kwiff is supercharging betting - making it bigger, better, and more entertaining. The only place where the odds on any player’s sports bet could epically improve - regardless of the sport, odds, or stake. This is called getting kwiffed. The app also offers players a range of casino games, including live casino and slots. Founded in 2015, we want to tear down the betting industry and rebuild a better one. One that works for the player, not the industry. kwiff is regulated and active in the UK and Internationally.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Majestic Star Casino

1 Buffington Harbor Drive, Gary, Indiana, 46406, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Enjoy 6 floors of gaming action at Majestic Star Casino! We’re bringing the ‘Win’ to the Windy City! Located just 35 minutes from Downtown Chicago, our casino features a huge selection of gaming options 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You can also enjoy in a wide variety of dining options, including our award winning Steakhouse. With the latest slots and wide array of table games, Majestic Star has something for everybody!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 313
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eaton-gate-gaming-ltd.jpeg
kwiff
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/majestic-star-casino.jpeg
Majestic Star Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
kwiff
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Majestic Star Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for kwiff in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Majestic Star Casino in 2025.

Incident History — kwiff (X = Date, Y = Severity)

kwiff cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Majestic Star Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Majestic Star Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eaton-gate-gaming-ltd.jpeg
kwiff
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/majestic-star-casino.jpeg
Majestic Star Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Majestic Star Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to kwiff company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Majestic Star Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to kwiff company.

In the current year, Majestic Star Casino company and kwiff company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Majestic Star Casino company nor kwiff company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Majestic Star Casino company nor kwiff company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Majestic Star Casino company nor kwiff company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither kwiff company nor Majestic Star Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither kwiff nor Majestic Star Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither kwiff company nor Majestic Star Casino company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Majestic Star Casino company employs more people globally than kwiff company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither kwiff nor Majestic Star Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither kwiff nor Majestic Star Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither kwiff nor Majestic Star Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither kwiff nor Majestic Star Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither kwiff nor Majestic Star Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither kwiff nor Majestic Star Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H