Comparison Overview

East House

VS

CO-EUR Holding B.V.

East House

259 Monroe Avenue, Suite 200, Rochester, 14607, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.easthouse.org

East House is a non-profit organization located in Rochester NY. For more than 58 years, East House has empowered individuals in recovery from mental health and substance use disorders to recover and to live healthy and fulfilling lives. The innovation that East House was built on in 1966 continues today, in the belief that safe, quality housing is necessary for healing and recovery. We meet every individual where they are on their recovery journey with a full spectrum of housing and recovery support options tailored to their needs. More than 1,200 clients and their families benefit from East House each year. East House is funded by the NYS Offices of Mental Health, Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services; Monroe County; client fees; and donations. For more information, visit www.easthouse.org.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 178
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CO-EUR Holding B.V.

Vivaldiplantsoen 200, Utrecht, 3533 JE, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.co-eur.com

Binnen Europa is in 2008 CO-EUR opgericht, hét kennisplatform op het gebied van eetstoornissen aan het spectrum van de overgewicht/obesitas zijde. CO-EUR richt zich zowel op de multidisciplinaire behandeling van eetstoornissen en daaraan gerelateerde psychische en fysieke klachten als op het wetenschappelijk onderzoek daarvan. Samen met de Universiteit Maastricht wordt onze behandeling nauwkeurig bewaakt en verder doorontwikkeld. Alle resultaten dienen verder als input voor het kennis- en expertisecentrum van CO-EUR. Onderzoek gebeurt zowel tijdens als na het behandeltraject om de effecten op langere termijn te meten. Door eetstoornissen veelvuldig aan wetenschappelijk onderzoek te onderwerpen kunnen eetstoornissen met (ernstig) overgewicht in de toekomst nog effectiever worden behandeld of zelfs preventief worden aangepakt.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/easthouseny.jpeg
East House
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/co-eur-holding-b-v-.jpeg
CO-EUR Holding B.V.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
East House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CO-EUR Holding B.V.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for East House in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CO-EUR Holding B.V. in 2026.

Incident History — East House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

East House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CO-EUR Holding B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CO-EUR Holding B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/easthouseny.jpeg
East House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/co-eur-holding-b-v-.jpeg
CO-EUR Holding B.V.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

East House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CO-EUR Holding B.V. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CO-EUR Holding B.V. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to East House company.

In the current year, CO-EUR Holding B.V. company and East House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CO-EUR Holding B.V. company nor East House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CO-EUR Holding B.V. company nor East House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CO-EUR Holding B.V. company nor East House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither East House company nor CO-EUR Holding B.V. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither East House nor CO-EUR Holding B.V. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CO-EUR Holding B.V. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to East House company.

East House company employs more people globally than CO-EUR Holding B.V. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither East House nor CO-EUR Holding B.V. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither East House nor CO-EUR Holding B.V. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither East House nor CO-EUR Holding B.V. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither East House nor CO-EUR Holding B.V. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither East House nor CO-EUR Holding B.V. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither East House nor CO-EUR Holding B.V. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References