Comparison Overview

Eastern Counties Laundries

VS

Australia Post

Eastern Counties Laundries

CO6 1NS, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 800 and 849

Private Commercial Laundry Business

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Australia Post

111 Bourke St, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Connecting businesses with consumers is the heart of commercial prosperity and the cornerstone of Australia Post's commitment to Australian businesses. As connectivity transforms our lives, Australia Post is evolving to meet the future needs of businesses by providing trusted service solutions in etailing, retailing, communications, financial services and postal. Continuous improvement of these services is our relentless objective. On LinkedIn, Australia Post only collects, uses and stores your personal information that relates to providing information in response to your queries. Without this information, Australia Post will be unable to look into your query. Your personal information may also be disclosed to third party service providers to facilitate this process. Your personal information is managed in accordance with Australia Post’s Privacy Policy. This sets out how you may seek access to and correction of your personal information and how to make complaints. A copy is available at auspost.com.au/privacy. Australia Post may only disclose the information provided by you if required or authorised by law, or in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Please refer to the Privacy Policy or contact the Privacy Contact Officer, Australia Post, GPO Box 1777, Melbourne, Vic 3000 for any privacy related queries.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 16,440
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Eastern Counties Laundries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australia-post.jpeg
Australia Post
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eastern Counties Laundries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australia Post
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eastern Counties Laundries in 2026.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australia Post in 2026.

Incident History — Eastern Counties Laundries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eastern Counties Laundries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australia Post (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australia Post cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Eastern Counties Laundries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australia-post.jpeg
Australia Post
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eastern Counties Laundries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australia Post company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australia Post company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Eastern Counties Laundries company.

In the current year, Australia Post company and Eastern Counties Laundries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australia Post company nor Eastern Counties Laundries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australia Post company nor Eastern Counties Laundries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australia Post company nor Eastern Counties Laundries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries company nor Australia Post company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries nor Australia Post holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries company nor Australia Post company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Australia Post company employs more people globally than Eastern Counties Laundries company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries nor Australia Post holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries nor Australia Post holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries nor Australia Post holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries nor Australia Post holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries nor Australia Post holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eastern Counties Laundries nor Australia Post holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.