Comparison Overview

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant

VS

Page Seager Lawyers

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant

2362 Bancroft Way, Berkeley, California 94704, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant offers sanctuary, solidarity, support, community organizing assistance, advocacy, and legal services to those escaping war, terror, political persecution, intolerance, exploitation, and other expressions of violence. We intentionally provide opportunities for transformational learning that arise from the relationships we fosters among refugees, immigrants, and host communities. We join with others to understand and eliminate the causes of violence and oppression worldwide. EBSC was formed in 1982, when East Bay congregations united in a covenant to provide sanctuary to Central American asylum seekers. Since that time, EBSC has grown to represent people from all over the world. EBSC is a non-political organization. We only represent immigrants as they navigate the often confusing United States Immigration System. EBSC has successfully represented more than 3,500 asylum seekers. EBSC is run by a small team of attorneys and paralegals with the support of our board of directors and member organizations. We are extremely grateful to have the financial support of several foundations, individual donors and the state of California. In addition, we depend heavily on our countless volunteers. For more information about volunteering at EBSC, click on "Volunteer" under the "Get Involved" tab on the top menu.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Page Seager Lawyers

Level 2, 179 Murray Street, Hobart, 7000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Page Seager specialises in commercial legal services with a Tasmanian connection. Our client-first approach is backed by a wealth of national expertise and local knowledge. We are home to the largest group of legal professionals in Tasmania, organised into dedicated teams with distinct skillsets. We cater exclusively to corporate entities, government bodies and insurance providers across Australia. Our specialised practice areas are: • Corporate and Commercial • Dispute Resolution • Employment and Safety • Insurance • Property, Planning and Environment • Workers Compensation We take a specialised approach, built on decades of shared experience in top-tier firms, and large public and private organisations. Our talented, passionate people work to ensure that every client achieves their business objectives. The strongest client relationships are built on mutual trust. To earn your trust, we make a point of understanding your goals, while treating your time as precious. Every step of the way, we explain how things work and keep the process on track.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/east-bay-sanctuary-covenant.jpeg
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/page-seager-lawyers.jpeg
Page Seager Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Page Seager Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for East Bay Sanctuary Covenant in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Page Seager Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Page Seager Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Page Seager Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/east-bay-sanctuary-covenant.jpeg
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/page-seager-lawyers.jpeg
Page Seager Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company and Page Seager Lawyers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Page Seager Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company.

In the current year, Page Seager Lawyers company and East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Page Seager Lawyers company nor East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Page Seager Lawyers company nor East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Page Seager Lawyers company nor East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company nor Page Seager Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant nor Page Seager Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company nor Page Seager Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Page Seager Lawyers company employs more people globally than East Bay Sanctuary Covenant company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant nor Page Seager Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant nor Page Seager Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant nor Page Seager Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant nor Page Seager Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant nor Page Seager Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither East Bay Sanctuary Covenant nor Page Seager Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X