Comparison Overview

Earthworks Landcaping

VS

Lavish

Earthworks Landcaping

None
Last Update: 2026-03-31
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://earthworks-landscaping.ca/

For over 15 years, Earthworks Landscaping has proudly served as the leading authority in fiberglass pool installation and residential landscaping throughout the communities of Burlington, Oakville, Mississauga, and Milton Ontario. Our expertise lies in the installation of fiberglass pools, landscape design and interlock and natural stone projects. We take pride in our ability to deliver unparalleled craftsmanship while ensuring competitive pricing for our clients.

NAICS: 238
NAICS Definition: Specialty Trade Contractors
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lavish

402 Moore Lane, Healdsburg, CA, 95448, US
Last Update: 2026-03-29
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lavishautomation.com

Lavish specializes in creating efficient, user-friendly technology solutions. Whether it is a full home theater or a simple audio system, we are able to create a customized solution that works with your lifestyle. We will guide you through the design, installation, and maintenance to ensure everything performs beyond your expectations.

NAICS: 238
NAICS Definition: Specialty Trade Contractors
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/earthworks-landcaping.jpeg
Earthworks Landcaping
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lavish-theaters.jpeg
Lavish
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Earthworks Landcaping
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lavish
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Specialty Trade Contractors Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Earthworks Landcaping in 2026.

Incidents vs Specialty Trade Contractors Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lavish in 2026.

Incident History — Earthworks Landcaping (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Earthworks Landcaping cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lavish (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lavish cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/earthworks-landcaping.jpeg
Earthworks Landcaping
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lavish-theaters.jpeg
Lavish
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Earthworks Landcaping company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lavish company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lavish company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Earthworks Landcaping company.

In the current year, Lavish company and Earthworks Landcaping company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lavish company nor Earthworks Landcaping company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lavish company nor Earthworks Landcaping company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lavish company nor Earthworks Landcaping company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping company nor Lavish company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping nor Lavish holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping company nor Lavish company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lavish company employs more people globally than Earthworks Landcaping company, reflecting its scale as a Specialty Trade Contractors.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping nor Lavish holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping nor Lavish holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping nor Lavish holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping nor Lavish holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping nor Lavish holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Earthworks Landcaping nor Lavish holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References