Comparison Overview

Ealing Law Centre

VS

Betters Law Firm PLLC

Ealing Law Centre

Hanwell Community Library, Hanwell, undefined, W7 3HL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We provide free legal advice and representation in Housing, Immigration and Welfare Benefits. You can find us at Hanwell Community Library. Our staff speak some community languages including Arabic, Punjabi and Somali. Our services are delivered by a team of qualified solicitors, accredited caseworkers and committed volunteers. ELC is a registered charity run by volunteer trustees. Our work is funded through legal aid, trust fund grants and donations. Our aim is to relieve poverty, suffering and distress among persons resident or working within London Borough of Ealing and neighbouring Boroughs through the provision of free legal advice and assistance; and the advancement of education for these persons. We are committed to working in partnership with other local organisations and if requested, will provide training on our specialist areas of law for the benefit of the community. For enquiries, please call 0208 579 4598 or [email protected] To make a donation, please visit our Facebook page @OfficialEalingLawCentre. If you shop online you can raise funds for us for free via: https://www.easyfundraising.org.uk/causes/ealinglawcentre

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Betters Law Firm PLLC

800 Town & Country Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Betters Law Firm offers comprehensive default and mortgage services nationwide. We provide the convenient service you want with the professional attention every legal matter deserves. Through our vetted network of licensed local counsel in all 50 states and U.S. territories, we ensure your legal solution satisfies the specific standards of your state and jurisdiction. Our legal solutions are customized to your needs and competitive in price, making us a far greater value than the websites churning out generic documents.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ealing-law-centre.jpeg
Ealing Law Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/betters-law-firm-pllc.jpeg
Betters Law Firm PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ealing Law Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Betters Law Firm PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ealing Law Centre in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Betters Law Firm PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Ealing Law Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ealing Law Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Betters Law Firm PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Betters Law Firm PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ealing-law-centre.jpeg
Ealing Law Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/betters-law-firm-pllc.jpeg
Betters Law Firm PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Betters Law Firm PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ealing Law Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Betters Law Firm PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ealing Law Centre company.

In the current year, Betters Law Firm PLLC company and Ealing Law Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Betters Law Firm PLLC company nor Ealing Law Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Betters Law Firm PLLC company nor Ealing Law Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Betters Law Firm PLLC company nor Ealing Law Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ealing Law Centre company nor Betters Law Firm PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ealing Law Centre nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ealing Law Centre company nor Betters Law Firm PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ealing Law Centre company employs more people globally than Betters Law Firm PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Ealing Law Centre nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ealing Law Centre nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ealing Law Centre nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ealing Law Centre nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ealing Law Centre nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ealing Law Centre nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X