Comparison Overview

E.S. Kluft & Company

VS

The Design Depot

E.S. Kluft & Company

11096 Jersey Blvd Ste 101, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Building on the traditions of over three generations of mattress craftsmanship, E.S. Kluft & Company is redefining the sleep industry of tomorrow. Whether you’re looking for the handmade California design of Aireloom or the unparalleled master craftsmanship of Kluft, our signature products set the true standard for luxury. Located on six acres in Southern California, E. S. Kluft & Company is dedicated to creating enduring, quality products. We’ve patented the next generation of beds that allow the sleeper optimum pressure relief, comfort, and support. We’re proud to continue our legacy of luxury for further generations to come.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Design Depot

52 Alexandra St, Hamilton, Waikato, 3204, NZ
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The Design Depot is an inspirational store offering an extensive range of furniture and homewares for your lifestyle. Specialising in design consultations, local and global product sourcing and bringing inspiration to every home, The Design Depot will help guide you to the right products that aesthetically look great but also are functional, practical, and fit your lifestyle.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e.s.-kluft-&-company.jpeg
E.S. Kluft & Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-design-depot.jpeg
The Design Depot
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
E.S. Kluft & Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Design Depot
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.S. Kluft & Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Design Depot in 2025.

Incident History — E.S. Kluft & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.S. Kluft & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Design Depot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Design Depot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e.s.-kluft-&-company.jpeg
E.S. Kluft & Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-design-depot.jpeg
The Design Depot
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both E.S. Kluft & Company company and The Design Depot company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Design Depot company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to E.S. Kluft & Company company.

In the current year, The Design Depot company and E.S. Kluft & Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Design Depot company nor E.S. Kluft & Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Design Depot company nor E.S. Kluft & Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Design Depot company nor E.S. Kluft & Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company company nor The Design Depot company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company nor The Design Depot holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company company nor The Design Depot company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

E.S. Kluft & Company company employs more people globally than The Design Depot company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company nor The Design Depot holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company nor The Design Depot holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company nor The Design Depot holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company nor The Design Depot holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company nor The Design Depot holds HIPAA certification.

Neither E.S. Kluft & Company nor The Design Depot holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.