Comparison Overview

E-S Sports Corporation

VS

Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK)

E-S Sports Corporation

47 Jackson Street, Holyoke, MA, 01040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

E-S Sports was founded in 1983 with a simple mission; to provide quality apparel and premiums at an affordable price, and to deliver on-time. Our mission has changed little over the years, but our business has grown substantially. We look forward to showing you why we have thousands of satisfied customers, from small, family businesses to Fortune 500 companies. Let us put our experience to work for you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK)

24 Old Queen Street, None, London, England, GB, SW1H 9HP
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Sneed Coding Solutions was founded with the belief that coding and marking should be simple for the customer. We strive to simplify complex coding and marking challenges for our customers. This allows them to focus their energy and efforts strategically on the most important aspects of their operations. Follow our page for updates, insights, trends and customer success stories. #KeepCodingSimple Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. is the wholly owned UK subsidiary of Sneed Coding Solutions, Inc.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-s-sports-corporation.jpeg
E-S Sports Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sneed-coding-solutions-ltd.-uk-.jpeg
Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
E-S Sports Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E-S Sports Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) in 2025.

Incident History — E-S Sports Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E-S Sports Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-s-sports-corporation.jpeg
E-S Sports Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sneed-coding-solutions-ltd.-uk-.jpeg
Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

E-S Sports Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to E-S Sports Corporation company.

In the current year, Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) company and E-S Sports Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) company nor E-S Sports Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) company nor E-S Sports Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) company nor E-S Sports Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation company nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation company nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor Sneed Coding Solutions, Ltd. (UK) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N