Comparison Overview

E-S Sports Corporation

VS

AIM Mail Centers

E-S Sports Corporation

47 Jackson Street, Holyoke, MA, 01040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

E-S Sports was founded in 1983 with a simple mission; to provide quality apparel and premiums at an affordable price, and to deliver on-time. Our mission has changed little over the years, but our business has grown substantially. We look forward to showing you why we have thousands of satisfied customers, from small, family businesses to Fortune 500 companies. Let us put our experience to work for you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AIM Mail Centers

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12

AIM Mail Centers is one of six packaging and shipping brands franchised by Annex Brands, Inc., headquartered in San Diego, California. Why should you choose AIM Mail Centers for your business service needs? Unlike service counters at each of the major carriers, we offer you a price comparison for UPS shipping, FedEx shipping and USPS shipping. It’s your package, your choice. When it comes to saving time and gas, AIM Mail Centers offer you a one-stop shop to get many of your office service needs done under one roof: fax sending and receiving, copying, printing, laminating, office supplies, packaging and mailing supplies, notary public, private mailbox rental and shipping of anything from a piece of paper to an ocean container. Come to AIM Mail Centers; we will save you time and money with one-stop shopping for all your packing and shipping needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-s-sports-corporation.jpeg
E-S Sports Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aim-mail-centers.jpeg
AIM Mail Centers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
E-S Sports Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AIM Mail Centers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E-S Sports Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIM Mail Centers in 2025.

Incident History — E-S Sports Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E-S Sports Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AIM Mail Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIM Mail Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-s-sports-corporation.jpeg
E-S Sports Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aim-mail-centers.jpeg
AIM Mail Centers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both E-S Sports Corporation company and AIM Mail Centers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, AIM Mail Centers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to E-S Sports Corporation company.

In the current year, AIM Mail Centers company and E-S Sports Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AIM Mail Centers company nor E-S Sports Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AIM Mail Centers company nor E-S Sports Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AIM Mail Centers company nor E-S Sports Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation company nor AIM Mail Centers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor AIM Mail Centers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation company nor AIM Mail Centers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AIM Mail Centers company employs more people globally than E-S Sports Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor AIM Mail Centers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor AIM Mail Centers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor AIM Mail Centers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor AIM Mail Centers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor AIM Mail Centers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither E-S Sports Corporation nor AIM Mail Centers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N