Comparison Overview

E.ON

VS

Neoenergia

E.ON

Brüsseler Platz 1, Essen, undefined, 45131, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09

The E.ON Group is one of Europe's largest operators of energy networks and energy infrastructure and a provider of innovative customer solutions for 50 million customers. Thus, we are decisively driving forward the energy transition in Europe and are committed to sustainability, climate protection, and the future of our planet.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 29,412
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Neoenergia

Praia do Flamengo, 78, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Somos uma companhia de capital aberto com ações (NEOE3) negociadas na Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo. Parte do grupo espanhol Iberdrola, atuamos no Brasil desde 1997, e atualmente, somos uma das líderes do setor elétrico do país. Estamos presentes em 18 estados e no Distrito Federal, com negócios em toda cadeia do setor elétrico: geração, transmissão, distribuição e comercialização. Nossas distribuidoras de energia, Neoenergia Coelba (BA), Neoenergia Pernambuco (PE), Neoenergia Cosern (RN), Neoenergia Elektro (SP/MS) e Neoenergia Brasília (DF) atendem a 16,5 milhões de clientes, o equivalente a uma população superior a 37 milhões de pessoas. Atuamos na geração, transmissão, distribuição e comercialização de energia e nossa matriz energética é 90% renovável! Por meio do Instituto Neoenergia, fomentamos o desenvolvimento sustentável a partir de ações socioambientais e, assim, contribuimos para a melhoria da qualidade de vida das comunidades onde estamos presentes, sobretudo, pessoas mais vulneráveis, visando sempre pelo desenvolvimento sustentável.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 11,640
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-on.jpeg
E.ON
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neoenergia.jpeg
Neoenergia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
E.ON
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Neoenergia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.ON in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neoenergia in 2025.

Incident History — E.ON (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.ON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Neoenergia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neoenergia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-on.jpeg
E.ON
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neoenergia.jpeg
Neoenergia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

E.ON company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Neoenergia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Neoenergia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to E.ON company.

In the current year, Neoenergia company and E.ON company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Neoenergia company nor E.ON company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Neoenergia company nor E.ON company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Neoenergia company nor E.ON company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither E.ON company nor Neoenergia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither E.ON nor Neoenergia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neoenergia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to E.ON company.

E.ON company employs more people globally than Neoenergia company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither E.ON nor Neoenergia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither E.ON nor Neoenergia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither E.ON nor Neoenergia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither E.ON nor Neoenergia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither E.ON nor Neoenergia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither E.ON nor Neoenergia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X