Comparison Overview

eMDs

VS

Swisscom

eMDs

10901 Stonelake Blvd, Austin, Texas, 78759, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

CompuGroup Medical is a leading provider of healthy solutions for healthy patients and healthy providers. We offer integrated electronic health records, practice management software, revenue cycle management solutions, and credentialing services for physician practices and enterprises. Founded by physicians, the company is an industry leader for usable, connected software that enables physician productivity and a superior clinical experience. eMDs software has received top rankings in physician and industry surveys including those conducted by the American Academy of Family Physiciansโ€™ Family Practice Management, AmericanEHRโ„ข Partners, MedScapeยฎ, and Black Bookยฎ. For more information, please visit http://www.emds.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 604
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swisscom

Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

As No. 1, we inspire people in the connected world. With the latest technologies and innovations, together we have the opportunity to shape the future. To do this, we are and act trustworthy, committed and curious. Are you with us? Join us on this exciting journey and work with us or in one of the DevOps Centres in Riga or Rotterdam in different business areas on the latest technological trends. Find out more about us and our vacancies on our careers page: www.swisscom.ch/career We look forward to hearing from you!

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 15,427
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-mds.jpeg
eMDs
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swisscom.jpeg
Swisscom
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
eMDs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swisscom
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eMDs in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swisscom in 2025.

Incident History โ€” eMDs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eMDs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Swisscom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swisscom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-mds.jpeg
eMDs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swisscom.jpeg
Swisscom
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both eMDs company and Swisscom company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Swisscom company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas eMDs company has not reported any.

In the current year, Swisscom company and eMDs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swisscom company nor eMDs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Swisscom company has disclosed at least one data breach, while eMDs company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Swisscom company nor eMDs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither eMDs company nor Swisscom company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Swisscom company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to eMDs company.

Swisscom company employs more people globally than eMDs company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X