Comparison Overview

e-Center

VS

Foster Printing

e-Center

6, rue Avaulée, Malakoff, 92240, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 800 and 849

Pionnier de l'impression numérique en France, e-Center imprime et façonne – sur mesure, en un seul lieu (Malakoff, 92) et selon les politiques RSE – tous vos supports de communication : livres d’entreprise, de photographies, catalogues d’exposition, dossiers de presse, cartons d’invitation, Look books, livrets, plaquettes…Désormais, les boites personnalisées (standards et sur-mesures imprimées ou rembordées), ainsi que l'atelier d'encadrement (caisses américaines, passe-partout...) complètent notre offre. Nous vous conseillons sur le choix du format, du papier, de la reliure adaptée à votre support (cahiers cousus, piqûre à cheval...) ainsi que sur les finitions (vernis sélectif, pelliculage, dorure, gaufrage) qui viendront apporter singularité et élégance à votre imprimé. Depuis plus de 20 ans, nos experts accompagnent de fidèles et exigeants clients (photographes, studios graphiques, agences de communication, institutions, maisons de luxe, Grands comptes) dans la production de leur communication Print. Quelques références : Vinci, Groupama, RATP, GL Events, Paris Match, Sotheby’s, Balmain, Cité de la musique, Groupe Lagardère, Kenzo, Bouygues Immobilier, Libération, Van Cleef & Arpels, Longchamp, EDF, Jean Paul Gauthier, Christian Dior, Yves Saint Laurent...

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 80
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foster Printing

700 East Alton Ave., Santa Ana, CA, 92705, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

In 1988, seeing the growing need by the trade for Large Format capability, we purchased the printing assets from Walter Foster Publishing and restructured the plant to meet the needs of the expanding marketplace. Today we spend our time making great impressions for our trade customers (printers / designers / corrugators / distributors), in addition to printing those great Walter Foster Art Books. The majority of our printing for the trade is in the color packaging, P.O.P. displays, signage and poster niches. In November 2008, we enhanced our operation by installing a new KBA 162a. This addition was necessary due to the demands of our trade customer base for large format, multi color printing with in-line UV on various substrates. In December 2010 we purchased and moved into a new 47,000 sft building and added another new KBA 162a. In 2012 we purchased a new KBA 205 (largest sheetfed press in the world). Ink on paper is our heritage, thanks to Walter Foster, we continue to build on that heritage and at the same time meet the demands of our environment. We are currently printing on a variety of substrates from 50# to 48pt. and from paper to plastics. We feature a special blend of experience and large press technology, while providing innovative solutions for even the most difficult projects. In short, we and our suppliers care about exceeding our customers requirements and the environmental requirements of our industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-center.jpeg
e-Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foster-printing.jpeg
Foster Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
e-Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foster Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for e-Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foster Printing in 2025.

Incident History — e-Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

e-Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foster Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foster Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-center.jpeg
e-Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foster-printing.jpeg
Foster Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

e-Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foster Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foster Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to e-Center company.

In the current year, Foster Printing company and e-Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foster Printing company nor e-Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foster Printing company nor e-Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foster Printing company nor e-Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither e-Center company nor Foster Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither e-Center nor Foster Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither e-Center company nor Foster Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

e-Center company employs more people globally than Foster Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither e-Center nor Foster Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither e-Center nor Foster Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither e-Center nor Foster Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither e-Center nor Foster Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither e-Center nor Foster Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither e-Center nor Foster Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L