Comparison Overview

Dzine Nest Studio

VS

James & Kay

Dzine Nest Studio

Pune, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Our strategy is result oriented for your business. Our creativity is success oriented with the objective of building your brand. Our work is proven results across Branding, Graphic Designing, App Design and Development, Web Design and Development, Print , Advertising, E-Learning Graphics and Digital Marketing Strategies & designs. Do speak to us with the objective of benefiting your business & brand. We’re enthusiastic about being of service to you. Write, Call, Message or simply drop by, we always love sharing our coffee.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

James & Kay

Lvl 3 Trotman building, Wodonga, VIC, 3690, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-02

James & Kay is a team of passionate design, digital and marketing professionals. For almost two decades we've been helping some of the world's most iconic brands build their identity and connect with their customers around the globe. At James & Kay we develop creative strategies based on the specific goals of our clients. From initial meeting through to final product you'll be part of a collaborative process that delivers creative solutions that truly represent you and your brand.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dzineneststudio.jpeg
Dzine Nest Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-and-kay.jpeg
James & Kay
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dzine Nest Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
James & Kay
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dzine Nest Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for James & Kay in 2025.

Incident History — Dzine Nest Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dzine Nest Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — James & Kay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

James & Kay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dzineneststudio.jpeg
Dzine Nest Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-and-kay.jpeg
James & Kay
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

James & Kay company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dzine Nest Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, James & Kay company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dzine Nest Studio company.

In the current year, James & Kay company and Dzine Nest Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither James & Kay company nor Dzine Nest Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither James & Kay company nor Dzine Nest Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither James & Kay company nor Dzine Nest Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio company nor James & Kay company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio nor James & Kay holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio company nor James & Kay company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dzine Nest Studio company employs more people globally than James & Kay company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio nor James & Kay holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio nor James & Kay holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio nor James & Kay holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio nor James & Kay holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio nor James & Kay holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dzine Nest Studio nor James & Kay holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X