Comparison Overview

Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C.

VS

Gard & Co. Solicitors

Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C.

700 W 47th St, Kansas City, Missouri, 64112, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C., combines traditional value with innovative solutions to provide outstanding legal service to clients. We are a full service law firm which owes the strength of our positioning today to the values upon which the firm was founded in 1934. As the firm has grown, so has our range of legal services. We have expanded our services to meet the ever-changing needs of our clients. This allows us to better assist clients in resolving issues and achieving their personal and business goals. Dysart Taylor’s primary mission is to be responsive to client needs on an immediate basis and at a reasonable cost. Our mission is based on the realization that quality in all phases of service is critical to the continuation of our clients’ success.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gard & Co. Solicitors

4 Bretonside, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 0BY, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Gard & Co. Solicitors is a firm of lawyers in the centre of Plymouth. We provide clear legal solutions to both business and individual clients throughout Devon and Cornwall and nationally. Our legal services include accident compensation, business law, conveyancing, divorce, employment law, family law, personal injury, probate and wills. To find out more about our legal services click on products/services tag above. At Gard & Co. Solicitors our lawyers take the time to build relationships with clients so that we can fully understand your legal needs. As individual lawyers and as a law firm, we aim to exceed your expectations, quickly getting to the root of your legal issues and resolving them with as little drama as possible. Located opposite the soon to be former Plymouth Bus Station we are easily accessible by public or private transport, with free parking available outside the office. To help our clients we have produced a number of articles on various legal issues. They are free to download for personal use from our website @ www.gardandco.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dysart-taylor-lay-cotter-&-mcmonigle-p-c-.jpeg
Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gard-&-co.-solicitors.jpeg
Gard & Co. Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gard & Co. Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gard & Co. Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gard & Co. Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gard & Co. Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dysart-taylor-lay-cotter-&-mcmonigle-p-c-.jpeg
Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gard-&-co.-solicitors.jpeg
Gard & Co. Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company and Gard & Co. Solicitors company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gard & Co. Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company.

In the current year, Gard & Co. Solicitors company and Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gard & Co. Solicitors company nor Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gard & Co. Solicitors company nor Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gard & Co. Solicitors company nor Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company nor Gard & Co. Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. nor Gard & Co. Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gard & Co. Solicitors company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company.

Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. company employs more people globally than Gard & Co. Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. nor Gard & Co. Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. nor Gard & Co. Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. nor Gard & Co. Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. nor Gard & Co. Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. nor Gard & Co. Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dysart Taylor McMonigle Brumitt & Wilcox, P.C. nor Gard & Co. Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X