Comparison Overview

Dynatrace

VS

Snowflake

Dynatrace

280 Congress St, None, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02210
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

Dynatrace keeps today’s AI-driven world working by advancing observability for today’s digital business. The world relies on software, but what isn’t seen is just how much complexity goes on behind the scenes to make sure everything stays up and running. Most businesses today have huge digital ecosystems made up of software, data flows, applications, and hybrid-cloud environments. As these ecosystems grow in complexity, so do the points of failure. Outages and glitches resulting in grounded flights or failed financial transactions prove how critical it is that software works as expected, making AI-powered observability an essential capability to ensure digital businesses run smoothly and recover quickly — keeping the world working. Dynatrace provides businesses with a holistic view of their entire digital ecosystem, removing the burden of operational monitoring and alert management. By automating these tasks, teams are empowered to transform complexity into their greatest asset and to drive their business forward by focusing on high-impact initiatives, driving topline acceleration, fueling innovation, and delivering experiences customers love.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 5,651
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Snowflake

The Cloud, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

**Snowflake is proud to be the Official Data Collaboration Provider for LA28 and Team USA.** Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Data Cloud, organizations unite their siloed data, easily discover and securely share governed data, and execute diverse analytic workloads. Wherever data or users live, Snowflake delivers a single and seamless experience across multiple public clouds. Snowflake’s platform is the engine that powers and provides access to the AI Data Cloud, creating a solution for data warehousing, data lakes, data engineering, data science, data application development, and data sharing. Join Snowflake customers, partners, and data providers already taking their businesses to new frontiers in the AI Data Cloud.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,269
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynatrace.jpeg
Dynatrace
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snowflake-computing.jpeg
Snowflake
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynatrace
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Snowflake
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Dynatrace has 127.27% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Snowflake in 2025.

Incident History — Dynatrace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynatrace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynatrace.jpeg
Dynatrace
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: exploited third-party integration (Drift), compromised Salesforce CRM connections
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snowflake-computing.jpeg
Snowflake
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party contractor's employee
Motivation: Theft of customer credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Multi-Channel Phishing (Email, SMS, Instant Messaging, Social Media, Malvertising), Malicious Links (Obfuscated, Hosted on Legitimate SaaS/Cloud Services), Fake CAPTCHA/Cloudflare Turnstile Lures (ClickFix), OAuth App Authorization Tricks (Device Code Flow, Salesforce Exploit), Malicious Browser Extensions (Takeover or New Installations), Malicious File Downloads (HTA, SVG, Executables), Stolen Credentials (From Phishing/Infostealers), MFA Gaps (Ghost Logins, SSO Misconfigurations)
Motivation: Data Theft (Extortion, Dark Web Sales), Financial Gain (Ransomware, Fraud), Account Takeover (Business Email Compromise, SaaS Abuse), Espionage (Corporate/Competitive Intelligence)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Snowflake company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dynatrace company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Snowflake company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Dynatrace company.

In the current year, Dynatrace company has reported more cyber incidents than Snowflake company.

Neither Snowflake company nor Dynatrace company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Snowflake company and Dynatrace company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Snowflake company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Dynatrace company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Dynatrace company nor Snowflake company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynatrace nor Snowflake holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Snowflake company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dynatrace company.

Snowflake company employs more people globally than Dynatrace company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Dynatrace nor Snowflake holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynatrace nor Snowflake holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynatrace nor Snowflake holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynatrace nor Snowflake holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynatrace nor Snowflake holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynatrace nor Snowflake holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H