Comparison Overview

Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble)

VS

Tompkins Industries, Inc

Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble)

323 NY Route 355, Poestenkill, NY, 12140, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Dynamic Systems Inc. (DSI) designs and manufactures equipment for dynamic thermal-mechanical testing of materials and physical simulation of processes. Typically, a sample of material is heated and mechanically worked while various performance parameters of interest are measured and recorded for later analysis. After the simulation or test is done, the microstructure of the material may also be examined. The most widely known machine produced by DSI for physical simulation is the Gleeble® System. The Gleeble System is produced in a number of different sizes and configurations. These machines typically have a high speed heating system, a servo hydraulic system and a computer control and data acquisition system. DSI Products provide a cost effective way to physically simulate high temperature processes and applications at a far lower cost than full scale tests while providing excellent correlation and results which can then be applied to the actual process or application.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tompkins Industries, Inc

1912 E 123Rd St, Olathe, KS, 66061, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Since 1967, Tompkins Industries has thrived at providing quality hydraulic adapters and fluid power products. We believe our commitment to superior customer service has been key to the leadership position we maintain today. Tompkins sells premium hydraulic fittings, adapters, hose protection and accessories through a nationwide network of independent dealers, distributors, and maintenance and repair organizations (MRO). We also work directly and through our distributors to supply Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) interested in using Tompkins fittings and adapters in their products.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-systems-inc.jpeg
Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tompkins-industries-us.jpeg
Tompkins Industries, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tompkins Industries, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tompkins Industries, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tompkins Industries, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tompkins Industries, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-systems-inc.jpeg
Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tompkins-industries-us.jpeg
Tompkins Industries, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tompkins Industries, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tompkins Industries, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company.

In the current year, Tompkins Industries, Inc company and Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tompkins Industries, Inc company nor Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tompkins Industries, Inc company nor Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tompkins Industries, Inc company nor Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company nor Tompkins Industries, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) nor Tompkins Industries, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tompkins Industries, Inc company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company.

Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) company employs more people globally than Tompkins Industries, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) nor Tompkins Industries, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) nor Tompkins Industries, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) nor Tompkins Industries, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) nor Tompkins Industries, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) nor Tompkins Industries, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynamic Systems Inc (Gleeble) nor Tompkins Industries, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H