Comparison Overview

Dynamic Screen Printing

VS

Main Graphics

Dynamic Screen Printing

300 Boone Rd, Burleson, Tx, 760285, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dsppro.com

Dynamic Screen Printing has been serving the Texas community since 1991 as a Wholesale & Retail Screen Print provider. We specialize in large quantity runs, custom screen printing, finishing, and packaging. Large Format Digital Printing, Die Cutting & Packaging Fulfillment. SCREEN PRINTED PRODUCTS Posters, Decals, Signs, Translites, Countercards, Hang-Tags, Floor Graphics, Toppers, Banners, Static Clings, Shelf Strips, Table Tents, Boxes, Corrugated Signs, Aluminum Tackers DIGITAL PRINTING SERVICES Banners, Static Clings, Decals, Labels, Card Stocks, Corrugated Plastics, Metal, Foamboards, Posters FULLFILLMENT SERVICES Kitting & Fulfillment, Shipping & Distribution, Die Cutting, Scoring, Banner Hemming, Grommets, Easels

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Main Graphics

15321 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, 92618, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.maingraphics.net

Main Graphics has been serving the graphic communication needs of businesses for the last 20+ years. Our focus has always been on driving the marketing success of our clients. We realize today more than ever before that our success is based solely on our ability to help our clients and their companies improve performance. Through the utilization of our On-demand Marketing Technology we help clients manage costs and drive greater efficiencies. Our use of technology provides streamlined procurement of print and marketing materials, timely distribution, true levels of inventory, analytic data, and ability to create unique marketing related products to target clients. Main Graphics drives to save bottom line costs and drive top line revenue and sales opportunities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-screen-printing.jpeg
Dynamic Screen Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-graphics.jpeg
Main Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynamic Screen Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Main Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamic Screen Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Main Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Dynamic Screen Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamic Screen Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Main Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Main Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-screen-printing.jpeg
Dynamic Screen Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/main-graphics.jpeg
Main Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Main Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dynamic Screen Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Main Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dynamic Screen Printing company.

In the current year, Main Graphics company and Dynamic Screen Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Main Graphics company nor Dynamic Screen Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Main Graphics company nor Dynamic Screen Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Main Graphics company nor Dynamic Screen Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing company nor Main Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor Main Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing company nor Main Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Main Graphics company employs more people globally than Dynamic Screen Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor Main Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor Main Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor Main Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor Main Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor Main Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor Main Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References