Comparison Overview

Dynamic Screen Printing

VS

KCS PRINT

Dynamic Screen Printing

300 Boone Rd, Burleson, Tx, 760285, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dsppro.com

Dynamic Screen Printing has been serving the Texas community since 1991 as a Wholesale & Retail Screen Print provider. We specialize in large quantity runs, custom screen printing, finishing, and packaging. Large Format Digital Printing, Die Cutting & Packaging Fulfillment. SCREEN PRINTED PRODUCTS Posters, Decals, Signs, Translites, Countercards, Hang-Tags, Floor Graphics, Toppers, Banners, Static Clings, Shelf Strips, Table Tents, Boxes, Corrugated Signs, Aluminum Tackers DIGITAL PRINTING SERVICES Banners, Static Clings, Decals, Labels, Card Stocks, Corrugated Plastics, Metal, Foamboards, Posters FULLFILLMENT SERVICES Kitting & Fulfillment, Shipping & Distribution, Die Cutting, Scoring, Banner Hemming, Grommets, Easels

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

KCS PRINT

Unit 1, Southgate Technology Park, Launceston, Cornwall, pl15 7ed, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kcsprint.co.uk

As specialists in the manufacture of high quality integrated label/form work we understand that quality and delivery dates are vital. That's why we are an ISO9001 Quality standard company. We are a trusted trade house for the print industry. Confidentiality is strictly maintained giving our customers confidence in our service. We can produce many products including integrated forms, continuous business forms and NCR pads right through to pop up banners, digital personalisation and vehicle graphics. Our in-house studio has the ability to visually transform the look of your company. With 25 years of service already behind us KCS have the vision to drive new ideas forward working with our customers on their ideas and requirements. Try us today – you'll be pleased you did!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-screen-printing.jpeg
Dynamic Screen Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kcs-trade-print.jpeg
KCS PRINT
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynamic Screen Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KCS PRINT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamic Screen Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KCS PRINT in 2025.

Incident History — Dynamic Screen Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamic Screen Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KCS PRINT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KCS PRINT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-screen-printing.jpeg
Dynamic Screen Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kcs-trade-print.jpeg
KCS PRINT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dynamic Screen Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KCS PRINT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KCS PRINT company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dynamic Screen Printing company.

In the current year, KCS PRINT company and Dynamic Screen Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KCS PRINT company nor Dynamic Screen Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KCS PRINT company nor Dynamic Screen Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KCS PRINT company nor Dynamic Screen Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing company nor KCS PRINT company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor KCS PRINT holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing company nor KCS PRINT company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dynamic Screen Printing company employs more people globally than KCS PRINT company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor KCS PRINT holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor KCS PRINT holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor KCS PRINT holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor KCS PRINT holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor KCS PRINT holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynamic Screen Printing nor KCS PRINT holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References