Comparison Overview

Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC

VS

Betfred

Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC

5300 S Portland Ave, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73119, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Dynamic Gaming Solutions is a full-service gaming solutions provider. We offer everything from electronic slot machines to classic table games. As a full-service solutions provider, we provide the games, as well as provide the service and supplies to accompany the games. This provides our clients with a single point of contact for all of their needs within the realm of electronic slots and table gaming. ​ We understand that each casino, regardless of size, deserves superior service. Therefore, we provide adaptive solutions to our clients’ casinos by integrating the newest slots, classic slots, and electronic table games to cultivate an exhilarating environment that is tailored to each casino’s clientele.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Betfred

56-58 Benson Road, Birchwood, WA3 7PQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Betfred is a leading betting and gaming company that has been at the forefront of the industry for over 50 years. With over 1300 shops and 9500 employees, we are constantly pushing ourselves to innovate and improve, and we are always on the lookout for the best talent to join our team. In 2019, we entered the US sports betting market as Betfred Sportsbook, and we now operate in 10 states. We have also recently established a new presence in South Africa, with over 50 betting halls, and we own a majority stake in Lottostar, South Africa's largest online betting company. At Betfred, our mission is to provide our customers with the best possible service, products and experience while ensuring responsible gambling. We believe our employees are our greatest asset and we are committed to providing them with the training and development they need to succeed. We offer a range of career opportunities, from retail positions in our shops to roles in our head office. We are also dedicated to giving back to the communities in which we operate. Through our Betfred Supports initiative, we support a range of charities and community initiatives. Join us on our journey and be a part of the Betfred team.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 3,492
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-gaming-solutions-llc.jpeg
Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/betfred.jpeg
Betfred
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Betfred
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Betfred in 2025.

Incident History — Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Betfred (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Betfred cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-gaming-solutions-llc.jpeg
Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/betfred.jpeg
Betfred
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Betfred company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Betfred company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company.

In the current year, Betfred company and Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Betfred company nor Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Betfred company nor Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Betfred company nor Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company nor Betfred company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC nor Betfred holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company nor Betfred company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Betfred company employs more people globally than Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC nor Betfred holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC nor Betfred holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC nor Betfred holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC nor Betfred holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC nor Betfred holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynamic Gaming Solutions, LLC nor Betfred holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H