Comparison Overview

Dynamic Engineering

VS

Blue Ash Tool & Die

Dynamic Engineering

654 N. Sam Houston Pkwy E, Houston, TX, 77060, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Dynamic was founded in 1985 as an Engineering Design Firm to primarily serve the Fine Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Markets. Dynamic has over 3000 successful Engineering Engagements, with Scope generally including Technology, Engineering Design, and Owner’s Engineering Services. Since relocating its headquarters to Houston in 2007, Dynamic has expanded into Proprietary Equipment Sales and Project Development and has increased activities in traditional energy, renewable chemicals & fuels, and high purity minerals. Recent international engagements include projects in India, US, China, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, Korea, Japan & Russia.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 163
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Blue Ash Tool & Die

4245 Creek Road, Cincinnati, 45241, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Blue Ash Tool & Die specializes in precision ground support tooling for the aviation industry and complex parts manufacturing. Celebrating 50 Years of Experience-Driven Quality! If you want it done right the first time expertise with accuracy is our strength! Our craftsmanship is precision-assured and government standards compliant meeting the most exacting demands for complex machining production. Blue Ash Tool & Die is S-523 Certified in ground support manufacturing for the aviation industry and MIL-I-45208 Certified in military inspection. We are also CE Certified as a Designated Supplier Quality Representative. Material types machined include: Steel, Stainless, Aluminum and some exotic materials. Experience with ground support tooling for jet engines (commercial and government) along with unique parts and components manufacturing. The keys to our machining capabilities and sustained longevity include versatile manufacturing equipment and experienced tool and die making journeymen. Experience the difference in quality manufacturing today!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-engineering.jpeg
Dynamic Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-ash-tool-&-die.jpeg
Blue Ash Tool & Die
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynamic Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blue Ash Tool & Die
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamic Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Ash Tool & Die in 2025.

Incident History — Dynamic Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamic Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blue Ash Tool & Die (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Ash Tool & Die cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-engineering.jpeg
Dynamic Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-ash-tool-&-die.jpeg
Blue Ash Tool & Die
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dynamic Engineering company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Blue Ash Tool & Die company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blue Ash Tool & Die company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dynamic Engineering company.

In the current year, Blue Ash Tool & Die company and Dynamic Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blue Ash Tool & Die company nor Dynamic Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blue Ash Tool & Die company nor Dynamic Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blue Ash Tool & Die company nor Dynamic Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dynamic Engineering company nor Blue Ash Tool & Die company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynamic Engineering nor Blue Ash Tool & Die holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dynamic Engineering company nor Blue Ash Tool & Die company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dynamic Engineering company employs more people globally than Blue Ash Tool & Die company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Dynamic Engineering nor Blue Ash Tool & Die holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynamic Engineering nor Blue Ash Tool & Die holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynamic Engineering nor Blue Ash Tool & Die holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynamic Engineering nor Blue Ash Tool & Die holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynamic Engineering nor Blue Ash Tool & Die holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynamic Engineering nor Blue Ash Tool & Die holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H