Comparison Overview

Dynamic Air Inc.

VS

Abasterm

Dynamic Air Inc.

None, None, St. Paul, Minnesota, US, 55110
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

Dynamic Air Inc. specializes in pneumatic conveying of dry bulk solids for the processing industries. We manufacture equipment and systems for handling a wide range of dry bulk materials from silica sand to sugar, with over 15,000 installations worldwide. Find out how our pneumatic conveyor systems and components can improve efficiency, reliability, and overall quality of your material conveying process with our dry bulk material handling solutions. Dynamic Air was founded in 1969 in St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, the location of our Corporate Headquarters. Dynamic Air Inc. and its subsidiaries in Brazil, China and England provide local manufacturing, sales, technical, and service support to customers and representatives worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Abasterm

Calle San Pablo 9900, Pudahuel, CL
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Por más de 25 años, ABASTERM S.A. ha sido sinónimo de respaldo y confianza en productos y servicio técnico para sus equipos térmicos, calderas y quemadores Misión: Superar las expectativas de nuestros clientes brindándoles confianza y un férreo compromiso. Por lo cual trabajamos agregando valor mediante un servicio de alta calidad y con el respaldo de marcas de prestigio.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-air-inc.jpeg
Dynamic Air Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abasterm-sa.jpeg
Abasterm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynamic Air Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Abasterm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamic Air Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abasterm in 2025.

Incident History — Dynamic Air Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamic Air Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Abasterm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abasterm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-air-inc.jpeg
Dynamic Air Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abasterm-sa.jpeg
Abasterm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Abasterm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dynamic Air Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Dynamic Air Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Abasterm company has not reported any.

In the current year, Abasterm company and Dynamic Air Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Abasterm company nor Dynamic Air Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Dynamic Air Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Abasterm company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Abasterm company nor Dynamic Air Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. company nor Abasterm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. nor Abasterm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. company nor Abasterm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dynamic Air Inc. company employs more people globally than Abasterm company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. nor Abasterm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. nor Abasterm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. nor Abasterm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. nor Abasterm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. nor Abasterm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynamic Air Inc. nor Abasterm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H