Comparison Overview

Dynamatic Technologies Limited

VS

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.

Dynamatic Technologies Limited

JKM Plaza, Dynamatic Aerotropolis, Bangalore, 562149, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dynamatics.com/

DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED designs and builds highly engineered products for Automotive, Aeronautic, Hydraulic and Security applications. With futuristic design, engineering and manufacturing facilities in Europe and India, we are able to meet customers'​ exacting requirements on 6 continents. Our facilities which are located in India (Bangalore, Chennai, Coimbatore, Nasik), United Kingdom (Swindon, Bristol) and Germany (Schwarzenberg), are lean, green and clean, and designed to support neighbouring communities as well as the environment. With three design laboratories in India and Europe, Dynamatic Technologies is a leading Private R&D Organisation, with numerous inventions and patents to its credit. The Company and its Subsidiaries employ around 50 scientists and 500 engineers with expertise in Mechanical Engineering, Advanced Computer Aided Engineering, Materials & Metallurgical Engineering, Fluid Dynamics and Defence & Aerospace Research. Dynamatic Technologies is vertically integrated, with its own alloy-making and casting capabilities as well as its own captive green energy sources.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 884
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.

210 Marketridge, Ridgeland, MS, 392157, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wardmech.com

Ward Mechanical is a company that values the highest level of service for our customers and the lines that we represent. Started in Mississippi in 1965, the same core values that the company was founded upon then, still exist today. With a unique combination of the finest manufacturers and a knowledgeable and motivated staff, Ward Mechanical Equipment stands out for our service and integrity. Extensive inventories and quick deliveries ensure customer satisfaction. Our mission is to be the preferred supplier of HVAC products to our customers in the State of Mississipi by providing quality products, engineering and design expertise and superior customer service.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamatic-technologies-limited.jpeg
Dynamatic Technologies Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ward-mechanical.jpeg
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynamatic Technologies Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamatic Technologies Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Dynamatic Technologies Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamatic Technologies Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamatic-technologies-limited.jpeg
Dynamatic Technologies Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ward-mechanical.jpeg
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dynamatic Technologies Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dynamatic Technologies Limited company.

In the current year, Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company and Dynamatic Technologies Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Dynamatic Technologies Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Dynamatic Technologies Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Dynamatic Technologies Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited company nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited company nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dynamatic Technologies Limited company employs more people globally than Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynamatic Technologies Limited nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References