Comparison Overview

Dynagraph

VS

Gallas Label & Decal

Dynagraph

Dynagraph Gulf FZ LLC, Dubai, undefined, 35495, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dynagraph.net

The future is here. Dynagraph is the leading provider of printing technology in the Middle East Region covering all aspects of print from start to finish. Applications include General Commercial printing, Folding Cartons, Flexible Packaging, Label packaging, Corrugating packaging, Security, Signage&Graphics, 3D Additive Manufacturing. We can supply you with cutting-edge technologies you need to tap into the latest industry trends and help you unleash, and grow your business potential all the while delivering premium quality and unlimited colors without compromise.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gallas Label & Decal

6559 North Avondale Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60631, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://GallasLabel.com

Some companies print stickers. Gallas crafts labels. A finely crafted label is the ultimate balance of form and function—and Gallas Label & Decal works to inspire your customers to interact with your brand. Your brand is their passion. Since 1947, the company has been creating premium labels for a myriad of products in many markets and providing stellar client service. From lifelike, high definition labels to eye-catching, no-label look labels to industrial instructional overlays, Gallas partners with you to realize the full potential of your brand and goals. Special processes include: UV and aqueous flexographic printing; UV rotary and flatbed screen printing; and digital printing. Whether you need labels for spirits, health and beauty aids, industrial or security applications, with Gallas, your project gets the attention it deserves. Evidence of their passion for labels and obsession with craft is present in the level of satisfaction their clients enjoy, the pride of their employees, and their meticulous attention to quality. This may be why some current clients have trusted Gallas with their labels since the 1950s. In 2013, Gallas earned ISO 9001:2008 certification - and Gallas is the only label printer in Chicago with this recognition. The safety, reliability and quality of our custom products meet the highest international benchmark – and it’s what our clients deserve. Plus, you’ll experience the personal attention you expect from a family-owned business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynagraph.jpeg
Dynagraph
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallas-label-&-decal.jpeg
Gallas Label & Decal
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dynagraph
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gallas Label & Decal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynagraph in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallas Label & Decal in 2025.

Incident History — Dynagraph (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynagraph cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gallas Label & Decal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallas Label & Decal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynagraph.jpeg
Dynagraph
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallas-label-&-decal.jpeg
Gallas Label & Decal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dynagraph company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gallas Label & Decal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gallas Label & Decal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dynagraph company.

In the current year, Gallas Label & Decal company and Dynagraph company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gallas Label & Decal company nor Dynagraph company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gallas Label & Decal company nor Dynagraph company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gallas Label & Decal company nor Dynagraph company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dynagraph company nor Gallas Label & Decal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dynagraph nor Gallas Label & Decal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dynagraph company nor Gallas Label & Decal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dynagraph company employs more people globally than Gallas Label & Decal company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Dynagraph nor Gallas Label & Decal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dynagraph nor Gallas Label & Decal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dynagraph nor Gallas Label & Decal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dynagraph nor Gallas Label & Decal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dynagraph nor Gallas Label & Decal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dynagraph nor Gallas Label & Decal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References