Comparison Overview

DXS

VS

Juniper Networks

DXS

Suite 3, 1st Floor, Ash House, Tanshire Park, Elstead, Godalming, GU8 6LB, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 600 and 649

DXS is a well-established UK healthcare IT provider. Our NHS approved clinical decision support and medicine optimisation software solutions for clinicians, ensure improved outcomes delivered cost-effectively. 𝗕𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘄𝗮𝘆: A clinical decision support solution encompassing a variety of tools and features to enhance decision making in the clinical workflow. BestPathway provides instant access to high-quality clinical guidance, treatment pathways, and SMART referral forms. ICBs/ICSs, Federations and PCNs can also use BestPathway as a communication tool to deliver the latest local information and updates. 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗲: A ground-breaking expert software solution developed for the therapeutic management of hypertension. ExpertCare’s expert algorithms provide just-in-time prescribing advice aimed at controlling the patient’s blood pressure to an appropriate target while achieving conformance with best evidence medicine guidance for the management of relevant comorbidities. ExpertCare simplifies complex medicine prescribing and significantly improves practice productivity.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Juniper Networks

1133 Innovation Way, Sunnyvale, CA, US, 94089
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 700 and 749

Juniper Networks is leading the revolution in networking, making it one of the most exciting technology companies in Silicon Valley today. Since being founded by Pradeep Sindhu, Dennis Ferguson, and Bjorn Liencres nearly 20 years ago, Juniper’s sole mission has been to create innovative products and solutions that meet the growing demands of the connected world. Juniper Networks is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, with over 9,000 employees in 50 countries and nearly $5 billion in revenue. Our customers include the top 100 global service providers and 30,000 enterprises, including the Global Fortune 100 as well as hundreds of federal, state and local government agencies and higher educational organizations. At Juniper Networks, we believe the network is the single greatest vehicle for knowledge, understanding, and human advancement that the world has ever known. Now more than ever, the world needs network innovation to connect ideas and unleash our full potential. Juniper is taking a new approach to the network — one that is intelligent, agile, secure and open to any vendor and any network environment. To learn more about Juniper, our products, and our vision for the decade ahead, visit our site at https://www.juniper.net. Acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2025.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,258
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dxssystems.jpeg
DXS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-networks.jpeg
Juniper Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DXS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Juniper Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DXS in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Juniper Networks in 2026.

Incident History — DXS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DXS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Juniper Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Juniper Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dxssystems.jpeg
DXS
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-networks.jpeg
Juniper Networks
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Custom Backdoors
Motivation: Long-term persistence and stealth
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Default Passwords
Motivation: Conduct DDoS Attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Custom Backdoors
Motivation: Espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Juniper Networks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DXS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Juniper Networks company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to DXS company.

In the current year, Juniper Networks company and DXS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

DXS company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Juniper Networks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has disclosed at least one data breach, while DXS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while DXS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while DXS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DXS nor Juniper Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Juniper Networks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DXS company.

Juniper Networks company employs more people globally than DXS company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither DXS nor Juniper Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DXS nor Juniper Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DXS nor Juniper Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DXS nor Juniper Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DXS nor Juniper Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DXS nor Juniper Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.