Comparison Overview

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

VS

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

Caxton House, London, SW1H 9NA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is the UK’s largest government department and is responsible for welfare, pensions and child maintenance policy. It administers the State Pension and a range of working age, disability and ill health benefits, serving around 20 million customers. DWP is responsible for • understanding and dealing with the causes of poverty rather than its symptoms • encouraging people to work and making work pay • encouraging disabled people and those with ill health to work and be independent • providing a decent income for people of pension age and promoting saving for retirement • providing value for money and reducing levels of fraud and error • reducing work-related death and serious injury in workplaces through the Health and Safety Executive DWP is a fast paced organisation which puts leadership at the centre of its transformation journey. The majority of DWP colleagues are part of the Operational Delivery Profession (ODP) – providing customer service to DWP’s 20 million customers across the UK. ODP is a thriving, inclusive professional community that supports colleagues and encourages them to learn, develop, grow and progress in their career to reach their full potential.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 32,061
Subsidiaries: 69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
27
Attack type number
3

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Lehae La Sars, 299 Bronkhorst Street, Pretoria, Gauteng, ZA, 0001
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Its main functions are to: collect and administer all national taxes, duties and levies; collect revenue that may be imposed under any other legislation, as agreed on between SARS and an organ of state or institution entitled to the revenue; provide protection against the illegal importation and exportation of goods; facilitate trade; and advise the Minister of Finance on all revenue matters

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,123
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dwp.jpeg
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sars.jpeg
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South African Revenue Service (SARS) in 2025.

Incident History — Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South African Revenue Service (SARS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South African Revenue Service (SARS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dwp.jpeg
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Exposure, Negligence, Insecure Work Practices
Motivation: None (Unintentional)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Email, Physical Theft/Loss (Laptop), Insecure Communication (WhatsApp), Improper Data Handling (Excel), Human Error
Motivation: Negligence/Incompetence
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: third-party compromise (Dodd Group), gateway attack, phishing (likely), dark web data exfiltration
Motivation: financial gain (ransom threats), espionage, geopolitical disruption, reputation damage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sars.jpeg
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has reported more cyber incidents than South African Revenue Service (SARS) company.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to South African Revenue Service (SARS) company.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) company employs more people globally than South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X