Comparison Overview

DVAG

VS

Credicorp

DVAG

Wilhelm-Leuschner-Straße 24 Frankfurt am Main, Hessen 60329, DE
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Deutsche Vermögensberatung was founded in 1976 by Dr. Reinfried Pohl. It is a privately held stock corporation in Germany and provides comprehensive financial services for individual clients, now also in Austria and Switzerland. Services offered comprise all aspects of consumer insurance, annuities, savings and financing solutions, as well as mutual funds.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Credicorp

Calle Centenario 154, Lima, Lima, 12, PE
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)

Strong

Somos el grupo financiero líder en el Perú con una vasta experiencia en el mercado peruano. Contamos con una sólida plataforma de Banca Comercial reforzada por una importante presencia en Banca de Inversión en Latinoamérica destinada a desarrollar el potencial de la región y acompañar a nuestros clientes en su crecimiento.   Ofrecemos un modelo de servicios financieros completo y diversificado en países como Perú, Bolivia, Estados Unidos, Panamá, Chile y Colombia; y desarrollamos operaciones esencialmente a través de nuestras seis principales subsidiarias: Banco de Crédito del Perú, BCP Bolivia, Mibanco, Pacífico Compañía de Seguros y Reaseguros, Prima AFP, Atlantic Security Bank y Credicorp Capital. El negocio de Credicorp se concentra principalmente en cuatro líneas de negocio: Banca Universal, Microfinanzas, Seguros y Pensiones, y Asesoría y Gestión de Inversiones.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38,543
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dvag.jpeg
DVAG
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupocredicorp.jpeg
Credicorp
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
DVAG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Credicorp
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DVAG in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Credicorp in 2025.

Incident History — DVAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DVAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Credicorp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Credicorp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dvag.jpeg
DVAG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupocredicorp.jpeg
Credicorp
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both DVAG company and Credicorp company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Credicorp company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DVAG company.

In the current year, Credicorp company and DVAG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Credicorp company nor DVAG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Credicorp company nor DVAG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Credicorp company nor DVAG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DVAG company nor Credicorp company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Credicorp company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DVAG company.

Credicorp company employs more people globally than DVAG company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X