Comparison Overview

DuraMark Technologies, Inc.

VS

EP Graphics, Inc.

DuraMark Technologies, Inc.

16450 Southpark Drive, WESTFIELD, Indiana, 46074, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

At DuraMark Technologies, we are radically changing the way people manage their durable safety labels and branding decals. While tremendous advances have been made in virtually every aspect of manufacturing, why continue to use the same traditional methods of printing individual labels on old screen printers and flexographic printers like we’ve done for the past hundred years? That’s the question we asked ourselves when we decided to form our company in 2007. Old traditional methods of printing were and are still fraught with significant challenges costing time, money and reducing the quality of the products they’re applied to. DuraMark’s 100% digital technology has changed the durable labeling playing field. Whether you're looking for ways to better support your lean manufacturing and quality assurance practices or simply looking for higher quality labels at a better price, DuraMark will give you the durability, flexibility and speed your company demands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EP Graphics, Inc.

169 S. Jefferson Street, Berne, IN, 46711, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

If you are looking for a personal and proactive approach to customer service, appropriate and cost effective solutions, attention to detail, clear and open communication, on-time mailing your titles deserve and people who care . . . We specialize in short to medium runs for a wide variety of catalogs, books and other publications. We offer a full spectrum of production capabilities, including conventional and electronic prepress, heat-set or non-heat-set printing on coated and uncoated paper in digest, standard or tabloid formats, saddle-stitch or perfect binding, as well as inside and outside ink-jet or Cheshire addressing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duramark-technologies-llc.jpeg
DuraMark Technologies, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ep-graphics.jpeg
EP Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DuraMark Technologies, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EP Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DuraMark Technologies, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EP Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — DuraMark Technologies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DuraMark Technologies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EP Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EP Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duramark-technologies-llc.jpeg
DuraMark Technologies, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ep-graphics.jpeg
EP Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EP Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EP Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company.

In the current year, EP Graphics, Inc. company and DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EP Graphics, Inc. company nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EP Graphics, Inc. company nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EP Graphics, Inc. company nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company nor EP Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. nor EP Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company nor EP Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EP Graphics, Inc. company employs more people globally than DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. nor EP Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. nor EP Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. nor EP Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. nor EP Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. nor EP Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. nor EP Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N