Comparison Overview

Dura-ID Solutions Limited

VS

MR Label Company

Dura-ID Solutions Limited

The George Falmoth Innovation Centre, Enterprise Way, Tankersley, Barnsley , South Yorkshire, S75 3DZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

We are global innovators in the manufacture of industrial labels and label printing. Whatever your industry, we have the labelling solution for you. We manufacture high-performance labels and tags for tracking and traceability, identification, health & safety, conformity, compliance and distribution in challenging environments. Dura-ID Solutions offers a wide range of high quality materials including extremely specialised products suitable for use in extreme temperatures of up to +1000 degrees Celsius, as well as long-term waterproof, weatherproof and virtually indestructible industrial strength non-tear products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MR Label Company

5018 Gray Road, Cincinnati, 45232, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1976, MR Label is a family-owned business which has grown from a one-room office into our current facility with over 19,000 square feet. MR Label specializes in producing custom, made-to-order, pressure sensitive labels, decals and tags. We have flexographic, screen, digital, and variable printing capabilities. We also offer a full in-house, pre-press department with complete Macintosh desktop publishing, image-setting, and plate-making services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dura-id-solutions.jpeg
Dura-ID Solutions Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mr-label-company.jpeg
MR Label Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dura-ID Solutions Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MR Label Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dura-ID Solutions Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MR Label Company in 2025.

Incident History — Dura-ID Solutions Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dura-ID Solutions Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MR Label Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MR Label Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dura-id-solutions.jpeg
Dura-ID Solutions Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mr-label-company.jpeg
MR Label Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Dura-ID Solutions Limited company and MR Label Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, MR Label Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dura-ID Solutions Limited company.

In the current year, MR Label Company company and Dura-ID Solutions Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Dura-ID Solutions Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Dura-ID Solutions Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Dura-ID Solutions Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dura-ID Solutions Limited company nor MR Label Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dura-ID Solutions Limited nor MR Label Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Dura-ID Solutions Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MR Label Company company.

Dura-ID Solutions Limited company employs more people globally than MR Label Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Dura-ID Solutions Limited nor MR Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dura-ID Solutions Limited nor MR Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dura-ID Solutions Limited nor MR Label Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dura-ID Solutions Limited nor MR Label Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dura-ID Solutions Limited nor MR Label Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dura-ID Solutions Limited nor MR Label Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L