Comparison Overview

Duplium Corporation

VS

Tecmach

Duplium Corporation

127 Jardin Drive., Vaughan, Ontario, L4K 1X5, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

At Duplium, we work as partners with you to find the best and most effective way to produce and distribute your product. To accomplish this, we provide you with a complete range of services and innovative solutions that improve supply chain efficiency and performance, while reducing costs and environmental impact. From custom print and packaging, advanced eCommerce solutions, merchandise manufacturing, Duplium provides industry-leading technology to suit your business objectives and the experience and expertise to bring your product to market.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tecmach

Av. Luiz Seraphico Júnior, 511, São Paulo, SP, 04729-080, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

A Tecmach é uma empresa especializada em Outsourcing de Impressão e soluções, com mais de 25 anos de mercado e abrangência nacional. Atualmente conta com cerca de 150 colaboradores e administra em torno de 40 milhões de páginas por mês. Mantém parceria com grandes fabricantes do mercado como LEXMARK, RICOH, EPSON, NDDigital, entre outros.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 93
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duplium-corporation.jpeg
Duplium Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tecmach.jpeg
Tecmach
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Duplium Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tecmach
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Duplium Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tecmach in 2025.

Incident History — Duplium Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Duplium Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tecmach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tecmach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duplium-corporation.jpeg
Duplium Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tecmach.jpeg
Tecmach
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Duplium Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tecmach company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tecmach company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Duplium Corporation company.

In the current year, Tecmach company and Duplium Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tecmach company nor Duplium Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tecmach company nor Duplium Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tecmach company nor Duplium Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Duplium Corporation company nor Tecmach company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Duplium Corporation nor Tecmach holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Duplium Corporation company nor Tecmach company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tecmach company employs more people globally than Duplium Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Duplium Corporation nor Tecmach holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Duplium Corporation nor Tecmach holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Duplium Corporation nor Tecmach holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Duplium Corporation nor Tecmach holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Duplium Corporation nor Tecmach holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Duplium Corporation nor Tecmach holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L